New Concept of Tooth Restoration

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.01.001

Abstract

Abstract: With the advancement of dental materials and adhesive technology, a great deal of evidence-based medicines show that there is no significant differences for longevity between direct and indirect restorations. The introduction and development of minimal invasive approach of restorative treatment makes more and more dentists realize the importance of retaining vital pulp and healthy tooth tissue. In this article, the minimal invasive principle and restorative cycle of restorative dentistry are described.

Key words: Direct restoration, Indirect restoration, Minimal invasive principle, Dynamic restoreotwe concept, Longevity

CHEN Zhi, CHEN Rui-tian. New Concept of Tooth Restoration[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(1): 1-9.

References

[1] Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, et al. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations [J]. J Dent Res, 2010, 89(10):1063-1067.
[2] Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Loomans BA, et al. Seven-year clinical evaluation of painful cracked teeth restored with a direct composite restoration [J]. J Endod, 2008, 34(7):808-811.
[3] Laegreid T, Gjerdet NR, Johansson AK. Extensive composite molar restorations: 3 years clinical evaluation [J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2012, 70(4):344-352.
[4] Hamburger JT, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Clinical performance of direct composite restorations for treatment of severe tooth wear [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2011, 13(6):585-593.
[5] Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Roeters FJ, et al. Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results [J]. J Dent Res, 2014, 93(1):36-41.
[6] Mm J, Nk B, A P. Minimal intervention dentistry-a new frontier in clinical dentistry [J]. J Clin Diagn Res,2014, 8(7):ZE04-ZE08.
[7] 陈智, 陈彬文. 根管治疗后牙体修复的治疗方案选择[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2015,33(2):115-120.
[8] Ryge G. Clinical criteria [J]. Int Dent J, 1980, 30(4):347-358.
[9] Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98--FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part Ⅰ) and criteria for evaluation (Part Ⅱ) of direct and indirect restorations includin [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2015, 57(5):300-302.
[10] Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2010, 14(4):349-366.
[11] Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations-a meta-analysis [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2012, 14(5):407-431.
[12] Astvaldsdottir A, Dagerhamn J, Dijken JW. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults - A systematic review [J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(8):934-954.
[13] Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent Res, 2014, 93(10):943-949.
[14] Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A, et al. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies [J]. Dent Mater, 2015, 31(8): 958-985.
[15] da Veiga AM, Cunha AC, Ferreira DM, et al. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent, 2016, 54:1-12.
[16] Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, et al. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent, 2016, 53:12-21.
[17] Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FB, Braga MM, et al. Survival rate of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent Res, 2016, 95(9):985-994.
[18] Abduo J, Sambrook RJ. Longevity of ceramic onlays: a systematic review [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2018, 30(3):193-215.
[19] Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF, et al. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent, 2016, 52:8-14.
[20] Kassardjian V, Varma S, Andiappan M, et al. A systematic review and meta analysis of the longevity of anterior and posterior all-ceramic crowns [J]. J Dent, 2016, 55:1-6.
[21] Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part Ⅰ: Single crowns [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18 Suppl 3:73-85.
[22] Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, et al. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure [J]. Dent Mater, 2015, 31(10):1214-1224.
[23] Manhart J, Chen HG, Hickel R, et al. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition [J]. Oper Dent, 2015, 29(5):481-508.
[24] Wittneben JG, Wright RF, Weber HP, et al. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2009, 22(5): 466-471.
[25] Heintze SD, Rousson V. Fracture rates of IPS empress all-ceramic crowns--a systematic review [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2010, 23(2):129.
[26] Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part Ⅰ: single crowns [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18(s3):73-85.
[27] Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2014, 27(1):33.
[28] Deligeorgi V, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations [J]. Prim Dent Care, 2001, 8(1):5-11.
[29] Kopperud SE, BA Tveit, Gaarden T, et al. Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure [J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2012, 120(6):539-548.
[30] Wilson NA, Whitehead SA, Mjör IA, et al. Reasons for the placement and replacement of crowns in general dental practice [J]. Prim Dent Care, 2003, 10(2):53-59.
[31] Elderton RJ. Restorations without conventional cavity preparations [J]. Int Dent J,1988, 38(2):112-118.
[32] Suksaphar W, Banomyong D, Jirathanyanatt T, et al. Survival rates against fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with full-coverage crowns or resin composite restorations: a systematic review [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2017, 42(3):157-167.
[33] Sharif MO, Catleugh M, Merry A, et al. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, (2):CD005971.
[34] Sharif MO, Merry A, Catleugh M, et al. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014, (2):CD005970.
[35] Hickel R, Brushaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations--criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations [J]. Dent Mater, 2013, 29(1):28-50.
[36] Gordan VV, Riley J, Geraldeli S, et al. The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from the National Dental PBRN [J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(12):1528-1534.
[37] Moncada G, Vildosola P, Fernandez E, et al. Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations [J]. Oper Dent, 2015, 40(1):34-43.
[38] Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, et al. Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97 [J]. Int Dent J, 2000, 50(1):1-12.
[39] Fernandez E, Martin J, Vildosola P, et al. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial [J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(2):279-286.
[40] Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, et al. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study [J]. J Dent, 2012, 40(10):829-835.
[41] Casagrande L, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations-A practice based study [J]. J Dent, 2017, 64:30-36.
[42] Wilson N, Lynch CD, Brunton PA, et al. Criteria for the replacement of restorations: academy of operative dentistry european section [J]. Oper Dent, 2016, 41(S7):S48-S57.
[43] Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation-clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples [J]. J Adhes Dent,2010, 12(4):259-272.
[44] Lynch CD, Blum IR, Frazier KB, et al. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations : Contemporary teaching in U.S. and Canadian dental schools [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2012, 143(2):157-163.
[45] Lynch CD, Hayashi M, Seow LL, et al. The management of defective resin composite restorations: current trends in dental school teaching in Japan [J]. Oper Dent, 2013, 38(5):497-504.
[46] Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NH. Teaching of direct composite restoration repair in undergraduate dental schools in the United Kingdom and Ireland [J]. Eur J Dent Educ, 2012, 16(1):e53-e58.
[47] Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NH. Teaching of the repair of defective composite restorations in Scandinavian dental schools [J]. J Oral Rehabil,2012, 39(3):210-216.
[48] Blum IR, Lynch CD, Schriever A, et al. Repair versus replacement of defective composite restorations in German dental schools [J]. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2011, 19(2):56-61.
[49] Setcos JC, Khosravi R, Wilson NH, et al. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school [J]. Oper Dent, 2004, 29(4):392-397.
[50] Brunton PA, Ghazali A, Tarif ZH, et al. Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania [J]. J Dent, 2017, 59:62-67.