Comparative Study on Different Methods to Measure the Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.06.018

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To compare the consistence of measurement of sagittal condylar inclination and transversal condylar inclination of individual normal occlusion in young people with mandibular motion recording device,wax record and silicone rubber occlusal record. Methods: Thirty-two individual normal occlusion from senior students of our college were selected. Zebris mandibular motion recording device (JMA), wax and occlusal recording silicone rubber were used to measure the sagittal condylar inclination and transversal condylar inclination, respectively. Results: The consistence of mandibular motion recording device was better than wax record and silicone rubber occlusal record. There were statistically significant differences in sagittal condylar inclination and transversal condylar inclination between Zebris and wax record (P<0.05) and between Zerbis and silicone rubber occlusal record (P<0.05), however, no significant difference between wax record and silicone rubber occlusal record (P>0.05). Conclusion: Zebris mandibular motion recording device (JMA) has good consistence,high sensitivity and convenience, so it has good clinical promotion value.

Key words: mandibular motion recording device, sagittal condylar inclination, transversal condylar inclination, fully adjustable articulator

LI Ning, SUN Xu, CHEN Zhiyu, YANG Jiadi, GUO Changjun. Comparative Study on Different Methods to Measure the Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(6): 564-568.

References

[1] Oancea L, Stegaroiu R, Cristache CM. The influence of temporomandibular joint movement parameters on dental morphology [J]. Ann Anat, 2018, 218:49-58.
[2] Hong SJ, Choi Y, Park M, et al. Setting the sagittal condylar inclination on a virtual articulator using intraoral scan of protrusive interocclusal position and cone beam computed tomography [J]. J Prosthodont, 2020, 29(2):185-189.
[3] Pröschel PA, Maul T, Morneburg T. Predicted incidence of excursive occlusal errors in common modes of articulator adjustment [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2000, 13(4):303-310.
[4] Kordaβ B, Bernhardt O, Ruge S, et al.Standard and limit values for the symmetry of articulation parameters in the temporomandibular joint area-evaluations of the associated project of the SHIP study [J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2019, 22(4):353-362.
[5] 傅开元.2014年新版国际颞下颌关节紊乱病分类及诊断标准解读[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2017,52(6):374-376.
[6] Mazurkiewicz P, Oblizajek M, Rzeszowska J, et al. Determining the occlusal plane:a literature review [J]. Cranio,2019,18:1-7.
[7] 刘之奥,徐卫华,郑之峻.基于CBCT的后段牙合平面和下颌骨形态间相关性研究[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(11):1078-1083.
[8] Landis JR,Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data [J]. Biometrics,1977,33(1):159-174.
[9] 贾玲,王云,汪萌芽.偏侧咀嚼对张闭口运动的影响[J].口腔医学研究,2015,31(9):887-889.
[10] Ahlers MO, Bernhardt O, Jakstat HA, et al. Motion analysis of the mandible: concept for standardized evaluation of computer-assisted recording of condylar movements [J]. J CranioMand Func,2014,6(4):333-352.
[11] Yoon HJ, Zhao KD, Rebellato J. Kinematic study of the mandible using an electromagnetic tracking device and custom dental appliance: Introducing a new technique [J]. J Biomech,2006,39 (12):2325-2330.
[12] Takashi U, Jun S, Yasuhiro O, et al. Studies evaluating measurement accuracy of CMS-JAW, a jaw motion tracking device with six degrees of freedom using an ultrasonic recording system [J]. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc, 2008, 52(3):350-359.
[13] Goob J, Erdelt K, Schweiger J, et al. Reproducibility of a magnet-based jaw motion analysis system [J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2020, 23(1):39-48.
[14] Posselt UP, Franzen G. Registration of the condyle path inclination by intraoral wax records: variations in three instruments [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1960, 10:441-454.
[15] Alshali RZ, Yar R, Barclay C, et al. Sagittal condylar angle and gender differences [J]. J Prosthodont, 2013, 22(7):561-565.
[16] Schierz O, Wagner P, Rauch A, et al. Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination [J]. Cranio, 2017, 37(1):60-67.
[17] Carossa M, Cavagnetto D, Ceruti P, et al. Individual mandibular movement registration and reproduction using an optoeletronic jaw movement analyzer and a dedicated robot:a dental technique [J]. BMC Oral Health,2020, 20(1):271.
[18] Reicheneder C, Gedrange T, Baumert U, et al. Variations in the inclination of the condylar path in children and adults [J]. Angle Orthod,2009,79(5):958-963.
[19] 刘峰,师晓蕊.面弓牙合架应用基本技术[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:118.
[20] Torabi K, Pour SR, Ahangari AH, et al. A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact Ⅱ and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2014, 27(6):541-543.