Effects of Different Nanostructures on Titanium or Titanium Alloy Implant Surface on Cell Behaviors

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.07.004

Abstract

Abstract: Different nanostructures of implant surface can be obtained by diverse methods, which have important effects on biological behaviors related to osteogenesis. In this paper, the influence of different nanostructures of titanium or titanium alloy implant surface on osteogenesis related cell behaviors is reviewed. It is aimed to provide theoretical basis for further improvement to implant surface topography and clinical application.

Key words: Nanostructure, Surface topography, Osteogenesis Cell adhesion

CAI Yan-kun, ZHENG Guo-ying, SUI Lei. Effects of Different Nanostructures on Titanium or Titanium Alloy Implant Surface on Cell Behaviors[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(7): 699-702.

References

[1] Goldman M, Juodzbalys G, Vilkinis V. Titanium surfaces with nanostructures influence on osteoblasts proliferation: a systematic review [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2014, 5(3):e1
[2] Zhao L, Mei S, Chu PK, et al. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions [J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(19):5072-5082
[3] Huang Q, Elkhooly TA, Liu X, et al. Effects of hierarchical micro/nano-topographies on the morphology, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2016, 145:37-45
[4] Brammer KS, Frandsen CJ, Jin S. TiO₂ nanotubes for bone regeneration [J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2012, 30(6):315-322
[5] Gongadze E, Kabaso D, Bauer S, et al. Adhesion of osteoblasts to a nanorough titanium implant surface [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2011, 6:1801-1816
[6] Zhao L, Liu L, Wu Z, et al. Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation [J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(9):2629-2641
[7] Park J, Bauer S, Schlegel KA, et al. TiO₂ nanotube surfaces: 15 nm--an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation[J]. Small, 2009, 5(6):666-671
[8] Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, et al. Nanosize and vitality TiO₂ nanotube diameter directs cell fate [J]. Nano Lett, 2007, 7(6):1686-1691
[9] Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, McLachlan T, et al. Differential responses of osteoblast lineage cells to nanotopographically-modified, microroughened titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy surfaces [J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(35):8986-8994
[10] Dey T, Roy P, Fabry B, et al. Anodic mesoporous TiO₂ layer on Ti for enhanced formation of biomimetic hydroxyapatite [J]. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7(4):1873-1879
[11] Zhang W, Li Z, Huang Q, et al. Effects of a hybrid micro/nanorod topography-modified titanium implant on adhesion and osteogenic differentiation in rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2013, 8:257-265
[12] Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Dalby MJ. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions [J]. Nanomedicine, 2010, 6(5):619-633
[13] Qiu J, Li J, Wang S, et al. TiO₂ nanorod array constructed nanotopography for regulation of mesenchymal stem cells fate and the realization of location-committed stem cell differentiation [J]. Small, 2016, 12(13):1770-1778
[14] Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo RO. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate [J]. Nat Mater, 2014, 13(6):558-569
[15] Zhou J, Li B, Han Y, et al. The osteogenic capacity of biomimetic hierarchical micropore/nanorod-patterned Sr-HA coatings with different interrod spacings [J]. Nanomedicine, 2016, 12(5):1161-1173
[16] Gardin C, Ferroni L, Favero L, et al. Nanostructured biomaterials for tissue engineered bone tissue reconstruction [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2012, 13(1):737-757
[17] Rani VV, Vinoth-Kumar L, Anitha VC, et al. Osteointegration of titanium implant is sensitive to specific nanostructure morphology [J]. Acta Biomater, 2012, 8(5):1976-1989
[18] Kim J, Kim HN, Lim KT, et al. Synergistic effects of nanotopography and co-culture with endothelial cells on osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells [J]. Biomaterials, 2013, 34(30):7257-7268
[19] Biela SA, Su Y, Spatz JP, et al. Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range [J]. Acta Biomater, 2009, 5(7):2460-2466
[20] Wittenbrink I, Hausmann A, Schickle K, et al. Low-aspect ratio nanopatterns on bioinert alumina influence the response and morphology of osteoblast-like cells [J]. Biomaterials, 2015, 62:58-65
[21] 许嘉允,邓飞龙,庄秀妹,等.纯钛微纳米复合形貌对成骨细胞生物学行为的影响[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(6):461-469
[22] Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation [J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(13):3395-3403
[23] Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, et al. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants [J]. Acta Biomater, 2014, 10(8):3363-3371
[24] Liang J, Xu S, Shen M, et al. Osteogenic activity of titanium surfaces with hierarchical micro-/nano-structures obtained by hydrofluoric acid treatment [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2017, 12:1317-1328