Research Progress in Early Treatment in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.10.003

Abstract

Abstract: The formation of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion is the interaction result of genetic and environmental factors, which becomes worse with growth and development. Clinically, early treatment is often carried out in order to reduce the difficulty of later treatment. Although early treatment can achieve good short-term effect, its long-term prognosis is controversial. This article reviews the etiology, early treatment efficacy, and the prediction of long-term prognosis in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion.

Key words: skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion, etiology, early treatment, prediction

CHEN Lulu, LU Haiping. Research Progress in Early Treatment in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(10): 922-924.

References

[1] Zere E, Chaudhari PK, Sharan J, et al. Developing Class Ⅲ malocclusions: challenges and solutions [J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 2018, 10:99-116.
[2] Iwasaki T, Sato H, Suga H, et al. Relationships among nasal resistance, adenoids, tonsils, and tongue posture and maxillofacial form in Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ children [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(5):929-940.
[3] Hultcrantz E, Larson M, Hellquist R, et al. The influence of tonsillar obstruction and tonsillectomy on facial growth and dental arch morphology [J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 1991, 22(2):125.
[4] Diouf JS, Ngom PI, Sonko O, et al. Influence of tonsillar grade on the dental arch measurements [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 147(2):214-220.
[5] Mattar SE, Matsumoto MA, Valera FC, et al. The effect of adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy on occlusal features in mouth-breathing preschoolers [J]. Pediatr Dent, 2012, 34(2):108-112.
[6] Seehra J, Fleming PS, Mandall N, et al. A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(1):96-101.
[7] Yang X, Li C, Bai D, et al. Treatment effectiveness of Fränkel function regulator on the Class Ⅲ malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2014, 146(2):143-154.
[8] 杜雅晶, 黄诗言, 饶南荃, 等. FränkelⅢ型矫治器早期矫治儿童骨性Ⅲ类错的临床疗效研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016,51(5):257-262.
[9] Mittal M, Singh H, Kumar A, et al. Reverse twin block for interceptive management of developing class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 2017, 35(1):86-89.
[10] Manuel N, Benedict W, Lorenzo F, et al. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination: a controlled clinical study [J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(5): 764-770.
[11] 于汉英,郝洁,邱赛男,等.未治疗的安氏Ⅲ类患者颅颌面生长发育特点[J].北京口腔医学,2016,24(4): 201-205.
[12] Zhang W, Qu HC, Yu M, et al. The effects of maxillary protraction with or without rapid maxillary expansion and age factors in treating class Ⅲ malocclusion: a meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0130096.
[13] Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, et al. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 148(4): 641-651.
[14] Onem Ozbilen E, Yilmaz HN, Kucukkeles N. Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion and alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction protocols followed by facemask therapy [J]. Korean J Orthod, 2019, 49(1): 49-58.
[15] Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, et al. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion [J]. Angle Orthod, 2010, 80(5): 799-806.
[16] Hugo DC, Lucia C, Tiziano B. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class Ⅲ patients [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138(5): 577-581.
[17] Maino G, Turci Y, Arreghini A, et al. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of hybrid rapid palatal expansion and facemask treatment in growing skeletal Class Ⅲ patients [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 153(2): 262-268.
[18] Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, et al. Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016, 150(5): 751-762.
[19] Ming Y, Hu Y, Li Y, et al. Effects of maxillary protraction appliances on airway dimensions in growing class Ⅲ maxillary retrognathic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2018, 105:138-145.
[20] Camacho M, Chang ET, Song SA, et al. Rapid maxillary expansion for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Laryngoscope, 2017, 127(7):1712-1719.
[21] Smyth RSD, Ryan FS. Early treatment of class Ⅲ malocclusion with facemask [J]. Evid Based Dent, 2017, 18(4): 107-108.
[22] Chatzoudi MI, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical effectiveness of chin cup treatment for the management of Class Ⅲ malocclusion in pre-pubertal patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Prog Orthod, 2014, 15(1): 62.
[23] Perinetti G, Bertoli A, Dzemidzic V. Outcome stability of orthopaedic treatment of Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion: A study of prognostic agreement between three models [J]. South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res, 2017, 4(2): 20-25.
[24] Nardoni DN, Siqueira DF, Cardoso MA, et al. Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study [J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2015, 20(1): 85-96.
[25] 彭朋. 上颌前方牵引矫治远期稳定性预测模型的建立[D]. 中国医科大学,2015.
[26] Radalj Milicic Z, Kranjcevic Bubica A, Nikolov Boric D, et al. Linear predictors of facial rotation pattern in croatian subjects with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion [J]. Acta Stomatol Croat, 2018, 52(3): 227-237.
[27] Wendl B, Kamenica A, Droschl H, et al. Retrospective 25-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in Angle Class Ⅲ patients : Success versus failure [J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2017, 78(2): 129-136.