A Discussion of the Consensus Process for Immediate Implantation in the Esthetic Area

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.10.003

Abstract

Abstract: Immediate implantation has been widely used in clinical practice due to its unique advantages. However, a highly complex operation accompanied with great aesthetic risks is included in the aesthetic zone by placing implant immediately. Higher requirements on indication, surgical operation and clinical skill of surgeon should be considered in immediate implant placement. In this review, the relevant references, consensus opinions, and recommended clinical programs for immediate implantation in the aesthetic zone under favorable and unfavorable conditions are searched, analyzed, summarized and discussed, to look forward to providing references for strategy, design and resolution of clinical cases.

Key words: esthetic zone, immediate implantation, digital guidance, flapless, bone augmentation technology

MA Yue, SONG Ke. A Discussion of the Consensus Process for Immediate Implantation in the Esthetic Area[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(10): 879-882.

References

[1] Cosyn J, De Lat L, Seyssens L, et al. The effectiveness of immediate implant placement for single tooth replacement compared to delayed implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46 Suppl 21:224-241.
[2] Bassir SH, El Kholy K, Chen CY, et al. Outcome of early dental implant placement versus other dental implant placement protocols: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Periodontol, 2019, 90(5): 493-506.
[3] Seyssens L, Eghbali A, Cosyn J. A 10-year prospective study on single immediate implants [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(10): 1248-1258.
[4] Chappuis V, Martin W. ITI treatment guide volume 10 implant therapy in the esthetic zone:current treatment modalities and materials for single-tooth replacement [M]. Berlin:Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH, 2017.
[5] Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T, et al. Group 5 ITI consensus report: digital technologies [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29 suppl 16: 436-442.
[6] Kaewsiri D, Panmekiate S, Subbalekha K, et al. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(6): 505-514.
[7] Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Marqués-Guasch J, et al. Fully guided versus half-guided and freehand implant placement: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020, 35(6): 1159-1169.
[8] Mediavilla Guzmán A, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided dynamic navigation compared to computer-aided static navigation for dental implant placement: an in vitro study [J]. J Clin Med, 2019, 8(12): 2123.
[9] Liu YF, Wu JL, Zhang JX, et al. Numerical and experimental analyses on the temperature distribution in the dental implant preparation area when using a surgical guide [J]. J Prosthodont, 2018, 27(1): 42-51.
[10] Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomó-Coll O, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review [J]. Ann Anat, 2019, 225:1-10.
[11] Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, et al. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? [J]. Periodontol 2000, 2015, 68(1): 122-134.
[12] Pisoni L, Ordesi P, Siervo P, et al. Flapless versus traditional dental implant surgery: long-term evaluation of crestal bone resorption [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74(7): 1354-1359.
[13] Groenendijk E, Staas TA, Bronkhorst E, et al. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization: Aesthetic outcome 1 year after implant placement. A prospective clinical multicenter study [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020, 22(2): 193-200.
[14] Noelken R, Moergel M, Kunkel M, et al. Immediate and flapless implant insertion and provisionalization using autogenous bone grafts in the esthetic zone: 5-year results [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(3): 320-327.
[15] Clementini M, Tiravia L, De Risi V, et al. Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2015, 42(7): 666-677.
[16] Clementini M, Agostinelli A, Castelluzzo W, et al. The effect of immediate implant placement on alveolar ridge preservation compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction: Radiographic results of a randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46(7): 776-786.
[17] Chu SJ, Salama MA, Garber DA, et al. Flapless postextraction socket implant placement, part 2: the effects of bone grafting and provisional restoration on peri-implant soft tissue height and thickness- a retrospective study [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2015, 35(6): 803-809.
[18] Girlanda FF, Feng HS, Corrêa MG, et al. Deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen improves soft and bone tissue outcomes in flapless immediate implant approach and immediate provisionalization: a randomized clinical trial [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2019, 23(10): 3885-3893.
[19] AlKudmani H, Al Jasser R, Andreana S. Is bone graft or guided bone regeneration needed when placing immediate dental implants? A systematic review [J]. Implant Dent, 2017, 26(6): 936-944.
[20] Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, et al. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? [J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017, 73(1): 84-102.
[21] Kinaia BM, Kazerani S, Korkis S, et al. Effect of guided bone regeneration on immediately placed implants: Meta-analyses with at least 12 months follow up after functional loading [J]. Implant Dent, 2019.
[22] Tonetti MS, Jung RE, Avila-Ortiz G, et al. Management of the extraction socket and timing of implant placement: Consensus report and clinical recommendations of group 3 of the XV European Workshop in Periodontology [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46 Suppl 21:183-194.
[23] de Oliveira-Neto OB, Lemos CA, Barbosa FT, et al. Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2019, 24(4): e518-e528.
[24] Montoya-Salazar V, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Torres-Sánchez C, et al. Outcome of single immediate implants placed in post-extraction infected and non-infected sites, restored with cemented crowns: A 3-year prospective study [J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(6): 645-652.
[25] Chen H, Zhang G, Weigl P, et al. Immediate placement of dental implants into infected versus noninfected sites in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 120(5): 658-667.
[26] Rupp F, Liang L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, et al. Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review [J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(1): 40-57.
[27] Ellis R, Chen S, Davies H, et al. Primary stability and healing outcomes of apically tapered and straight implants placed into fresh extraction sockets. A pre-clinical in vivo study [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(8): 705-714.
[28] Jung RE, Al-Nawas B, Araujo M, et al. Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient‐reported outcomes [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29 Suppl 16: 69-77.
[29] 傅文麒,刘慧颖.种植体表面生物活性元素的添加及其对骨免疫微环境的调控[J].口腔医学研究,2020,36(10):908-911.
[30] Sanz-Sánchez I, Sanz-Martín I, Figuero E, et al. Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(8): 964-982.
[31] Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin WS, et al. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29 suppl 16: 215-223.
[32] 孙黎波,黄海霞,兰玉燕,等.硬腭带蒂结缔组织移植在上颌前牙即刻种植的临床应用[J].口腔医学研究,2018,34(6):671-674.