Application and Research Progress of Bulk-fill Resin-based Composites on Primary Teeth

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.12.005

Abstract

Abstract: Compared with traditional resin-based composites, bulk-fill resin-based composites can skip the time-consuming layering process by enabling up to 4 or 5mm thick increments to be cured in one step. The common concerns of composite shrinkage, microleakage, and durability are indistinguishable between two types of composites. In this paper, we will review the classification and properties of bulk-fill composites and discuss its application on restoration of primary teeth.

Key words: bulk-fill resin-based composite, primary teeth, resin filling, mechanical property, clinical application

MA Hongyi, YANG Dongmei. Application and Research Progress of Bulk-fill Resin-based Composites on Primary Teeth[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(12): 1124-1127.

References

[1] Yadav R, Kumar M. Dental restorative composite materials: A review[J]. J Oral Biosci, 2019, 61(2):78-83.
[2] Sarapultseva M, Sarapultsev A. Flowable Bulk-Fill materials compared to nano ceramic composites for class Ⅰ cavities restorations in primary molars: A two-year prospective case-control study[J]. Dent J (Basel), 2019, 7(4):94.
[3] 陈智, 张磊, 赵小娥.大块充填树脂在牙体修复中的应用与研究进展[J].口腔疾病防治,2017,25(4):205-210.
[4] Rizzante FAP, Duque JA, Duarte MAH, et al. Polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites[J]. Dent Mater J, 2019, 38(3):403-410.
[5] Gerula-Szymanska A, Kaczor K, Lewusz-Butkiewicz K, et al. Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class Ⅱ restorations-A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies[J]. Dent Mater J, 2020, 39(3):335-344.
[6] Arbildo-Vega HI, Lapinska B, Panda S, et al. Clinical effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and conventional resin composite restorations: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2020, 12(8):1786.
[7] Cidreira Boaro LC, Pereira Lopes D, de Souza ASC, et al. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Dent Mater, 2019, 35(10):e249-e264.
[8] Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, et al. Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites in water and artificial saliva[J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(12):1511-1518.
[9] Kim RJ, Kim Y, Choi N, et al. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites[J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(4):430-439.
[10] Lins RBE, Aristilde S, Osório JH, et al. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class Ⅱ restorations[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2019, 98:255-261.
[11] 薛晶.大块充填树脂的临床应用影响因素[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2020,38(3):237-243.
[12] 张欢.三种大块充填树脂机械性能的比较研究[D].中国医科大学,2016.
[13] Papadogiannis D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P, et al. Viscoelastic properties, creep behavior and degree of conversion of bulk fill composite resins[J]. Dent Mater, 2015, 31(12):1533-1541.
[14] Yap AU, Eweis AH, Yahya NA. Dynamic viscoelastic characterization of bulk-fill resin-based composites and their conventional counterparts[J]. Oper Dent, 2020, 45(2):173-182.
[15] Mundada MV, Hugar SM, Hallikerimath S, et al. Comparative evaluation of retention and antibacterial efficacy of compomer and glass hybrid bulk fill restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition-An in vivo two-arm parallel-group double-blinded randomized controlled study[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2020, 13(Suppl 1):S45-S54.
[16] Arbildo-Vega HI, Lapinska B, Panda S, et al. Clinical effectiveness of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Polymers, 2020, 12(8):1786.
[17] 杨曼,赵远,魏红,等.大块复合树脂联合透明预成冠美学修复乳切牙的临床评价[J].口腔疾病防治,2021,29(1):34-39.
[18] Mosharrafian S, Shafizadeh M, Sharifi Z. Fracture resistance of a bulk-fill and a conventional composite and the combination of both for coronal restoration of severely damaged primary anterior teeth[J]. Front Dent, 2019, 16(1):69-77.
[19] Paganini A, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Margin integrity of bulk-fill composite restorations in primary teeth[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(17):3802.
[20] Akman H, Tosun G. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2020, 23(4):489-497.
[21] 向珊珊,丛芳.超声大块树脂修复乳磨牙根管治疗后牙体缺损疗效观察[J].中国中西医结合儿科学,2019,11(6):506-509.
[22] 张韵晴,杨志雄,刘昌明.大块树脂应用于根管治疗后乳磨牙充填的临床价值分析[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2020,7(1):53-55.
[23] Ehlers V, Gran K, Callaway A, et al. One-year clinical performance of flowable bulk-fill composite vs conventional compomer restorations in primary molars[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2019, 21(3):247-254.
[24] Ferracane JL, Lawson NC. Probing the hierarchy of evidence to identify the best strategy for placing class Ⅱ dental composite restorations using current materials[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2021, 33(1):39-50.
[25] Sampaio CS, Garcés GA, Kolakarnprasert N, et al. External marginal gap evaluation of different resin-filling techniques for class Ⅱ restorations-A micro-CT and SEM analysis[J]. Oper Dent, 2020, 45(4):E167-E175.
[26] Putignano A, Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, et al. Comparison of three different bulk-filling techniques for restoring class Ⅱ cavities: μCT, SEM-EDS combined analyses for margins and internal fit assessments[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2021, 124:104812.
[27] Delgado A, Jamal H, Young A, et al. Scoping review of trials evaluating adhesive strategies in pediatric dentistry: where do simplified strategies lie?[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1):33.
[28] Ghajari MF, Sheikholeslamian M, Ghasemi A, et al. Effect of different application techniques of universal bonding system on microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill composites to primary and permanent dentin[J]. Front Dent, 2020, 17(2):1-8.