Effects of Implant Surface on the Biological Behavior of Gingival Epithelium

Abstract

Abstract: Ideal gingival epithelium-implant barrier can prevent bacteria in the mouth and their products from invading internal environment. This is beneficial to the long-term success of dental implants and decreases the peri-implantitis. Resent years, increasing studies show that implant surface significantly affects biological responses of gingival epithelium. These researches are instructive and meaningful to the design of trans-gingival surfaces, which enhance the success rate of implants. The purpose of this study is to review the effects of implant surface on the cellular responses as well as the mechanism of influencing gingival epithelium attachment.

Key words: Dental implant, Gingival epithelium, Influence factor

CLC Number:

R782.1

ZHAO Yu-ting, MENG Wei-yan. Effects of Implant Surface on the Biological Behavior of Gingival Epithelium[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2015, 31(9): 942-944.

References

[1] Daniel B, Hans PW, Karl D, et al. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs [J]. J Periodontol,1992,63(3)∶225-235
[2] 李英,彭玉田,汪大林,等.牙龈结合上皮对铸造钛种植体附着状况的超微结构研究[J].第二军医大学学报,2000,21(5)∶460-462
[3] Ikiru A, Yasunori A, Yoichiro O, et al. Evaluations of epithelial sealing and peri-implant epithelial down-growth around ''step-type'' implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2012,23(4)∶459-466
[4] Takashi S, Takaki Y, Kazuko S, et al. Expression and localization of laminin 5, laminin 10, type IV collagen, and amelotin in adult murine gingiva [J]. J Mol Histol, 2014, 45(3)∶293-302
[5] Hidehiro I, Masaru S,Takayoshi Y, et al. Difference in penetration of horseradish peroxidase tracer as a foreign substance into the peri-implant or junctional epithelium of rat gingivae [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002, 13(3)∶243-251
[6] Kazuhiro S, Takashi S, Yasuo M, et al. Ultrastructural study of tissues surrounding replanted teeth and dental implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(3)∶299-305
[7] Baumhammers A, Langkamp HH, Matta RK, et al. Scanning electron microscopy of epithelial cells grown on enamel, glass and implant materials [J]. J Periodontol, 1978, 49(11)∶592-597
[8] Teng FY, Ko CL, Kuo HN, et al. A comparison of epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and osteoblasts in dental implant titanium topographies [EB/OL].http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/687291/2011-09-28
[9] Na A, Xiaohui R, Marco W, et al. Initial attachment, subsequent cell proliferation /viability and gene expression of epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to different titanium [J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(12)∶1207-1214
[10] Maristella DC, Paola T,Claudio F, et al. Spreading of epithelial cells on machined and sandblasted titanium surfaces: an in vitro study [J]. J Periodontol, 2003, 74(3)∶289-295
[11] Lauer G, Wiedmann M, Otten J, et al. The titanium surface texture effects adherence and growth of human gingival keratinocytes and human maxillar osteoblast-like cells in vitro [J]. Biomaterials,2001, 22(20)∶2799-2809
[12] Baharloo B, Textor M, Brunette DM. Substratum roughness alters the growth, area, and focal adhesions of epithelial cells, and their proximity to titanium surfaces [J]. J Biomed Mater Res , 2005, 74(1)∶12-22
[13] Ikiru A, Yasunori A, Akihiro F, et al. In Vivo and In Vitro Studies of Epithelial Cell Behavior around Titanium Implants with Machined and Rough Surfaces [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 2(28)∶1-9
[14] Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. A light and electron microscopic study of the effects of surface topography on the behavior of cells attached to titanium-coated percutaneous implants [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1991, 25(3)∶387-405
[15] Yuzhi J, Shuliang L. Three-dimensional insights into dermal tissue as a cue for cellular behavior [J]. Burns, 2014, 40(2)∶191-199
[16] Michael SG, Casey LD, Derin SB, et al. Myoblast alignment on 2D wavy patterns: Dependence on feature characteristics and cell-cell interaction [J]. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2014, 2(20)∶1-10
[17] E. T. den Braber, J. E. de Ruijter, L. A. Ginsel, et al. Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1998, 40(2)∶291-300
[18] J. F. Piccuch. Extraskeletal implantation of aporous hydroxyapatite ceramic [J]. J Dent Res,1982, 61(12)∶1458-1460
[19] Douglas WH, Babak C, Donald MB. Comparative response of epithelial cells and osteoblasts to microfabricated tapered pit topographiesin vitro andin vivo [J]. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(14)∶2281-2293
[20] Kyohei M, Jun T. Anodized-hydrothermally treated titanium with a nanotopographic surface structure regulates integrin-a6b4 and laminin-5 gene expression in adherent murine gingival epithelial cells [J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2013, 57(2)∶99-108
[21] Barbara S, Sorachon Y, Thomas J, et al. Dermal fibroblast and epidermal keratinocyte functionality on titaniananotube arrays [J]. Acta Biomater,2011, 7(6)∶2686-2696
[22] Sandra W, Olivvier H, Benoit F, et al. The effect of microstructured surfaces and laminin-derived peptide coatings on soft tissue interactions with titanium dental implants [J]. Biomaterials, 2009, 30 (12)∶2291-2301