口腔医学研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 721-724.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.07.008

• 基础研究论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

热刺激取出骨结合种植体动物模型的建立

郭廷, 孟凡文*   

  1. 安徽医科大学解放军第359医院临床学院 江苏 镇江 212001
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-30 出版日期:2017-07-20 发布日期:2017-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 孟凡文,E-mail:dentist953@163.com
  • 作者简介:郭廷(1990~ ),男,安徽宿州人,硕士在读,研究方向为口腔种植。
  • 基金资助:
    全军医药卫生科研面上项目(编号:MS059)

Establishment of Dog Model for Removing Osseointegrated Dental Implant by Thermal Stimulation.

GUO Ting, MENG Fan-wen*.   

  1. The 359th Hospital of PLA, Anhui Medical University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.
  • Received:2016-11-30 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2017-07-27

摘要: 目的:研究热刺激取出骨结合牙种植体的条件,建立热刺激微创取出骨结合牙种植体的动物模型。方法:选用4只1~2岁杂种犬为实验动物,拔除双侧下颌第三或第四前磨牙,2个月后常规植入牙种植体,3个月后经临床及放射学检查,确定骨结合形成,随机选取右侧为实验侧,组成实验组,分别以(48±1) ℃持续1 min (简称A因素)、(53±1) ℃持续2.5 min(B)、(59±1) ℃持续3.5 min(C)刺激实验侧种植体,于每次热刺激前及刺激后4周测量种植体稳定性系数(ISQ),改良菌斑指数(modified plaque index ,mPLI),探诊深度( probing depth ,PD),观察影像学表现以及能否用扭矩扳手取出种植体,左侧为对照侧,组成对照组,不施加任何热刺激,测量项目同实验组。采用SPSS22.0统计软件对实验数据进行统计分析。结果:A、B因素刺激前和刺激后4周,实验组与对照组相比, ISQ 、mPLI,PD无显著性差异,影像学无明显变化,无法用扭矩扳手取出种植体。C因素刺激后4周与对照组相比,实验组ISQ明显下降,差异具有显著性(P<0.05),根尖X片显示种植体周围出现线形低密度影,低密度影外侧骨密度略有增高,但mPLI,PD实验组和对照组无显著性差异,实验组采用50 Ncm的扭矩可以取出种植体,对照组无法取出。种植体取出术后2个月,实验组牙槽骨基本愈合,与取出术前相比,牙槽嵴宽度和高度无显著性变化。 结论:动物实验显示,已完成骨结合的种植体在(59±1) ℃持续3.5 min热刺激条件下可使其周围骨质出现有限破坏,从而破坏其骨结合,达到微创取出种植体的目的,成功建立了热刺激取出骨结合牙种植体动物模型。

关键词: 牙种植体, 骨结合, 热刺激, 微创, 取出术

Abstract: Objective: To establish an animal model to study how to remove osseointegrated dental implants by thermal stimulation. Methods: Four mongrel dogs of 1-2 years old were selected as experimental animal. The third or fourth mandibular premolars were extracted and dental implants were placed in the edentulous area after 2 months. The osseointegration was confirmed by clinical and radiological examination after 3 months. The right side of each dog was randomly selected as experimental group for thermal stimulation, and the left side as blank control group. 48±1℃ for 1min (A), 53 ± 1 ℃ for 2.5min (B), and 59 ± 1 ℃ for 3.5min (C) were used to stimulate the experimental group respectively. The probing depth (PD), modified plaque index (mPLI), implant stability quotient (ISQ), radiological manifestations, and probability to remove the implants by torque wrench of bilateral implants were observed and measured before and 4 weeks after thermal stimulation. SPSS22.0 statistical software was used to analyze the statistical data of the experiment. Results: There was no significant difference between experimental group and control group on ISQ, mPLI, and PD before and 4 weeks after stimulation A and B, and there was no obvious change in radiography. The implant could not be removed by torque wrench. Compared with the control group in stimulation C, the ISQ of the experimental group decreased significantly (P<0.05), and the X-ray shows linear low density image around the implant, and the bone density around the low density image increased slightly. But there was no significant difference in mPLI and PD. On the experimental group, the implants could beremoved with the torque of 50Ncm, and the control group could not be removed. Two months after the removal of implant, the alveolar bone healed well. Compared with the pre-operation, there was no significant change in alveolar ridge width and height. Conclusion: The dog model of removing osteointegrated implants with minimal trauma by thermal stimulation is successfully established. The animal experiment demonstrates that appropriate thermal stimulation (59 ± 1 ℃ for 3.5 min) can destroy the bone around dental implant limitedly.

Key words: Dental implant , Osseointegration, Thermal stimulation, Minimally invasive , Extraction

中图分类号: