交互式电动牙刷对正畸青少年菌斑控制的评价

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.09.014

口腔医学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 838-841.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2023.09.014

交互式电动牙刷对正畸青少年菌斑控制的评价

郑雅心¹, 龙雨吟², 张俊杰², 陈炜翔², 李欢欢², 龚贝妮², 陈晓波^1*

1.厦门医学院附属口腔医院正畸一科,厦门市口腔疾病诊疗重点实验室福建厦门 361008;
2.厦门医学院福建厦门 361023

收稿日期:2023-03-13 出版日期:2023-09-28 发布日期:2023-09-25
通讯作者: *陈晓波,E-mail:7581999@qq.com
作者简介:郑雅心(1987~ ),女,吉林梅河口人,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事口腔正畸学和口腔分子生物学的研究。
基金资助:
厦门市医疗卫生科技计划项目(编号:3502Z20209241);厦门医学院大学生创新创业训练计划项目(编号:202012631038)

Assessment of Dental Plaque Control for Fixed Orthodontic Adolescents using Interactive Electric Toothbrushes

ZHENG Yaxin¹, LONG Yuyin², ZHANG Junjie², CHEN Weixiang², LI Huanhuan², GONG Beini², CHEN Xiaobo^1*

1. Department of Orthodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Stomatological Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, Xiamen 361008, China;
2. Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361023, China

Received:2023-03-13 Online:2023-09-28 Published:2023-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 评估正在进行固定正畸治疗的青少年患者使用手动牙刷、普通电动牙刷、交互式电动牙刷控制菌斑的效果。方法: 将75名正在进行固定正畸治疗的青少年随机分为手动、普通电动、交互式电动牙刷3组。分别在第0、2、6周测量患者的改良牙菌斑指数,并通过问卷评估患者刷牙的积极性及刷牙时长。结果: 在2、6周时,与手动牙刷组相比,电动牙刷组及交互式电动牙刷组控制菌斑效果更好(P<0.05),同时交互式电动牙刷组更优于普通电动牙刷组(P<0.05)。与手动牙刷及电动牙刷组相比,交互式电动牙刷组患者的刷牙时长及积极性显著增加(P<0.05)。结论: 使用电动牙刷可以更有效地帮助青少年正畸患者清除牙菌斑,而交互式电动牙刷可以提高患者刷牙依从性,控制菌斑效果最佳。

关键词: 菌斑指数, 正畸, 交互式电动牙刷, 依从性

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of manual toothbrush, ordinary electric toothbrush, and interactive electric toothbrush on plaque control for fixed orthodontic adolescents. Methods: Seventy-five adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances were randomly divided into manual, ordinary electric, and interactive electric toothbrush groups. Modified plaque index was measured after 0, 2, and 6 weeks, and the brushing times and motivation were assessed through questionnaires. Results: Compared with manual group, the ordinary electric and interactive electric toothbrush groups had significantly more plaque index reduction after 2 and 6 weeks, and the interactive electric group was better than the ordinary electric group (P<0.05). The brushing times and motivation of interactive electric groups increased significantly compared with other two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Electric toothbrushes can effectively help fixed orthodontic adolescents to remove dental plaque. Interactive electric toothbrush can improve the motivation of tooth brushing and get better plaque control effect.

Key words: plaque index, orthodontics, interactive electric toothbrush, motivation

郑雅心, 龙雨吟, 张俊杰, 陈炜翔, 李欢欢, 龚贝妮, 陈晓波. 交互式电动牙刷对正畸青少年菌斑控制的评价[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(9): 838-841.

ZHENG Yaxin, LONG Yuyin, ZHANG Junjie, CHEN Weixiang, LI Huanhuan, GONG Beini, CHEN Xiaobo. Assessment of Dental Plaque Control for Fixed Orthodontic Adolescents using Interactive Electric Toothbrushes[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2023, 39(9): 838-841.

参考文献

[1] Erbe C, Klukowska M, Timm HC, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a power brush/irrigator/mouthrinse routine on plaque and gingivitis reduction in orthodontic patients [J]. Angle Orthod, 2019, 89(3):378-384.
[2] 郭飞扬,花放.正畸釉质脱矿微创治疗的研究进展[J].口腔医学研究,2021,37(4):288-291.
[3] 卢海丽,康娜.无托槽隐形矫治器与固定矫治器对正畸患者牙周健康影响的研究现状和进展[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(7):625-628.
[4] Davidovich E, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Timm H, et al. Randomised clinical study of plaque removal efficacy of an electric toothbrush in primary and mixed dentition [J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2021, 31(5):657-663.
[5] Scheerman JFM, van Meijel B, van Empelen P, et al. The effect of using a mobile application ("WhiteTeeth") on improving oral hygiene: A randomized controlled trial [J]. Int J Dent Hyg, 2020, 18(1):73-83.
[6] White JS, Ramos-Gomez F, Liu JX, et al. Monetary incentives for improving smartphone-measured oral hygiene behaviors in young children: A randomized pilot trial [J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7):e0236692.
[7] Kanoute A, Carrouel F, Gare J, et al. Evaluation of oral hygiene-related mobile Apps for children in sub-saharan Africa [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(19):12565.
[8] Erbe C, Klees V, Ferrari-Peron P, et al. A comparative assessment of plaque removal and toothbrushing compliance between a manual and an interactive power toothbrush among adolescents: a single-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2018, 18(1):130.
[9] Busscher HJ, Jager D, Finger G, et al. Energy transfer, volumetric expansion, and removal of oral biofilms by non-contact brushing [J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2010, 118(2):177-182.
[10] Erbe C, Klees V, Braunbeck F, et al. Comparative assessment of plaque removal and motivation between a manual toothbrush and an interactive power toothbrush in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances: A single-center, examiner-blind randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2019, 155(4):462-472.
[11] Zorina OA, Boriskina OA, Petrukhina NB, et al. Influence of different type of toothbrushes on the incidence of enamel demineralization and gingivitis in the course of orthodontic treatment [J]. Stomatologiia (Mosk), 2020, 99(2): 34-39.
[12] Gürbüz S, Çankaya ZT, Cinal E, et al. Effects of interactive power toothbrush with or without application assistance on the plaque, gingivitis, and gingival abrasion among dental students: a randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26(9): 5931-5941.
[13] Abdulraheem S, Bondemark L. Hawthorne effect reporting in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: truth or myth? Blessing or curse? [J]. Eur J Orthod, 2018, 40(5):475-479.
[14] Casaroto E, Generoso JR Jr, Serpa Neto A, et al. Comparing human to electronic observers to monitor hand hygiene compliance in an intensive care unit [J]. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol, 2022, 2(1):e161.
[15] Mylonopoulou IM, Pepelassi E, Madianos P, et al. A randomized, 3-month, parallel-group clinical trial to compare the efficacy of electric 3-dimensional toothbrushes vs manual toothbrushes in maintaining oral health in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 160(5):648-658.
[16] Petker-Jung W, Weik U, Margraf-Stiksrud J, et al. What characterizes effective tooth brushing of daily users of powered versus manual toothbrushes? [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2022, 22(1):10.
[17] Eidenhardt Z, Ritsert A, Shankar-Subramanian S, et al. Tooth brushing performance in adolescents as compared to the best-practice demonstrated in group prophylaxis programs: an observational study [J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1): 359.
[18] 丁敏,刘阳,王思斯,等.手动和电动牙刷控制口腔卫生的临床随机对照试验[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2022,36(3):174-180.

交互式电动牙刷对正畸青少年菌斑控制的评价

Assessment of Dental Plaque Control for Fixed Orthodontic Adolescents using Interactive Electric Toothbrushes

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	樊秀汝, 刘佳. 正畸治疗在牙周病联合治疗中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(9): 780-784.
[2]	范雅儒, 孟庆芳, 吴倩倩. 影响正畸中下颌阻生第三磨牙自发性近中移动的相关因素研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(9): 804-809.
[3]	李芷悦, 庞光明, 施优灵. 颏部与唇部位置关系对美观影响的三维美学分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(7): 628-633.
[4]	毕蓝, 张荣和. 正畸治疗中激光作用于牙周组织的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(6): 479-482.
[5]	黄梓澄, 孔卫东. 切牙管形态及其在正畸矫治中的临床意义[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(5): 388-391.
[6]	顾铭, 徐辉. 增龄性因素对固定矫正患者初粘后疼痛的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(4): 350-352.
[7]	初可嘉, 王海慧, 郑之峻, 彭菊香. 牙龈生物型对上颌埋伏尖牙正畸牵引后牙周组织的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(4): 353-356.
[8]	徐静, 胡敏. 正畸微种植体定位方法研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(2): 101-104.
[9]	林维龙, 吴晓沛, 何薇薇, 安峰. 重组人转化生长因子-β1对大鼠正畸牙移动模型成骨细胞分化及ERK/MAPK信号通路的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(2): 118-123.
[10]	张曼, 张苗苗, 李易, 王贺, 张严匀. 牙齿移动过程中Piezo1对压力侧牙周组织内IL-1β、IL-6及IL-17的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(2): 135-140.
[11]	刘鎵仪, 周彦恒. 人工智能在正畸诊疗及疗效预测中的应用进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2023, 39(10): 862-865.
[12]	管佳妮, 严斌. 龈沟液内正畸牙移动相关生物标志物的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(5): 400-403.
[13]	李平, 尹娟, 徐旻馨, 薛慧. 低强度脉冲超声对人牙周膜细胞Hippo信号通路的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(11): 1087-1091.
[14]	贺红, 杜明远. 对正畸诱导性牙根吸收生物层面的认识[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(10): 907-912.
[15]	刘新煜, 胡敏. 骨质疏松症及相关治疗药物对正畸治疗影响的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(10): 913-916.