Journal of Oral Science Research ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 319-322.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.03.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of Types of Bulk-fill Resin-based Composite on Gingival Adaption in Class Ⅱ Restorations.

ZHANG Lei1, CAO Pei-lin1, PAN Yi-sha1, CHEN Rui-tian1, ZOU Jia-yuan1, ZHAO Xiao-e2, WANG Zheng-zhi3, CHEN Zhi1*   

  1. 1. Department of Cariology and Endodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
    2. Department of Cariology and Endodontics, Lanzhou Hospital of Stomatology, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    3. Department of Engineering Mechanics, School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2018-01-11 Online:2018-03-30 Published:2018-03-27

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of bulk-fill resin-based composite type on gingival adaption of class Ⅱ cavities. Methods: Twenty-eight extracted human third molars were collected. Two class Ⅱ cavites (2x3x4 mm) were prepared on mesial and distal surfaces of each tooth. Class Ⅱ cavities were randomly divided into 7 groups (n=8), and the cavities were restored by 2 low viscosity, 3 high viscosity bulk-fill resin-based composites or 2 conventional resin-based composites, respectively. Acoustic emission (AE) signals were recorded from the beginning of light-curing of resin composite and lasted for 1000 s. The percentage of microleakage formation (M%) were calculated using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Data obtained from AE and OCT were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Results: Two low viscosity bulk-fill resin-based composites generated significantly less AE events (15.7; 17.6) and lower M% (16.1; 14.1) (P<0.05). Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.941 between AE test and OCT (P<0.05). Conclusion: The low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites demonstrate better internal adaption in class Ⅱ resotorations. AE and OCT can be used to assess the marginal integrity of resin composites.

Key words: Bulk-fill resin composite, Microleakage, Acoustic emission, Optical coherence tomography, Class Ⅱ