Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bonding Effects of Universal Adhesives

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.11.004

Abstract

Abstract: Universal adhesives can be used for both etch-and-rinse and self-etch approaches. Their clinical applications are simple and convenient, so they are favored by many dentists. However, different etching modes bring different bonding effect. In this study, the bonding effect of different etching modes of universal adhesives were reviewed. For enamel bonding, the use of etch-and-rinse mode resulted in higher bond strengths than self-etch mode. For dentin bonding, etch-and-rinse mode was more suitable for super mild universal adhesives and self-etch mode was more suitable for mild universal adhesives. For special tooth surface such as dental fluorosis and sclerotic dentin, the application of acid etching was able to bond more strongly, as for caries affected dentin, there was no significant difference in the bonding strengths between two etching modes.

Key words: universal adhesives, etch-and-rinse, self-etching, bonding

JIANG Bulin, HUANG Cui. Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bonding Effects of Universal Adhesives[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(11): 1018-1021.

References

[1] 黄翠,刘英衡.口腔粘接与粘固的区别和联系[J].口腔医学研究,2021,37(5):381-385.
[2] Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives [J]. Dent Mater,2011,27(1):17-28.
[3] 郭景梅,雷文龙,杨宏业,等.通用型粘接剂在口腔粘接修复中的应用[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016,51(3):189-192.
[4] Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, et al. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin [J]. J Dent, 2017, 62:72-80.
[5] Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, et al. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability-A systematic review [J]. Materials, 2019, 12(5):790.
[6] Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, et al. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems [J]. Oper Dent, 2016, 41(5):520-530.
[7] Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes [J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(7):800-807.
[8] Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(7):765-776.
[9] Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine-Old wine in new bottles? [J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(5):525-536.
[10] 朱轩言,朱松.提高通用粘接剂与牙本质粘接性能的研究进展[J].口腔医学研究,2021,37(10):883-885.
[11] Elkaffas AA, Hamama H, Mahmoud SH. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2018, 43(3):e29.
[12] Cruz J, Silva A, Eira R, et al. Dentin permeability and nanoleakage of universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse vs self-etch modes [J]. Oper Dent, 2021, 46(3):293-305.
[13] Sezinando A, Perdigao J, Ceballos L. Long-term in vitro adhesion of polyalkenoate-based adhesives to dentin [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2017, 19(4):305-316.
[14] Manfroi FB, Marcondes ML, Somacal DC, et al. Bond strength of a novel one bottle multi-mode adhesive to human dentin after six months of storage [J]. Open Dent J, 2016, 10:268-277.
[15] Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives [J]. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(26):3757-3785.
[16] Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin [J]. Oper Dent, 2015, 40(3):282-292.
[17] Shahroom N, Mani G, Ramakrishnan M. Interventions in management of dental fluorosis, an endemic disease: A systematic review [J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2019, 8(10):3108-3113.
[18] Cardenas AFM, Armas-Veja A, Rodriguez Villarreal JP, et al. Influence of the mode of application of universal adhesive systems on adhesive properties to fluorotic enamel [J]. Braz Oral Res, 2019, 33:e120.
[19] Siqueira FSFD, Armas-Vega A, Izquierdo-Bucheli A, et al. Does the conditioning mode and duration of universal adhesives affect the bonding effectiveness to fluorotic enamel? [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2019, 21(6):525-536.
[20] Badavannavar AN, Ajari S, Nayak K, et al. Abfraction: Etiopathogenesis, clinical aspect, and diagnostic-treatment modalities: A review [J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2020, 31(2):305-311.
[21] Josic U, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, et al. Is clinical behavior of composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions influenced by the application mode of universal adhesives? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Dent Mater, 2021, 37(11):e503-e521.
[22] Ranjitha GR, Vikram R, Meena N, et al. Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial [J]. J Conserv Dent, 2020, 23(3):227-232.
[23] Pinna R, Maioli M, Eramo S, et al. Carious affected dentine: its behaviour in adhesive bonding [J]. Aust Dent J, 2015, 60(3):276-293.
[24] Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, et al. The impact of artificially caries-affected dentin on bond strength of multi-mode adhesives [J]. J Conserv Dent, 2018, 21(2):136-141.
[25] Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, et al. Degradation of multimode adhesive system bond strength to artificial caries-affected dentin due to water storage [J]. Oper Dent, 2018, 43(2):E92-E101.
[26] Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, et al. The bonding performance of a universal adhesive to artificially-created caries-affected dentin [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2017, 19(4):317-321.
[27] Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, et al. Is there a best protocol to optimize bond strength of a universal adhesive to artificially induced caries-affected primary or permanent dentin? [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2016, 18(5):441-446.