Journal of Oral Science Research ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 591-595.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2026.07.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

In Vitro Study on Effects of Water-air Cooling Mode and Laser Energy Parameters on Efficiency and Safety of Er:YAG Laser in Ceramic Veneer Removal

LI Xiaowen1, XU Xinyi1, XUE Miao2, SUN Rui2, SHENG Hanxing2, BI Wenya3, YAN Zhuoqun3, SUN Lei1,2*   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China;
    2. TMD/Geriatric Stomatology Center, Hefei Stomatology Hospital, Hefei 230001, China;
    3. UPCERA Collaborative Research Center, Liaoning Upcera Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110000, China
  • Received:2026-01-09 Published:2026-07-22

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of water-air spray cooling modes and laser energy parameters of erbium doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser in veneer removal and its safety regarding both soft and hard dental tissues. Methods: An in vitro veneer bonding model was established. Specimens were randomly assigned to two groups based on the presence or absence of water-air spray cooling: Group A (no cooling) and Group B (with cooling). In each group, five incremental energy levels of Er:YAG laser irradiation were applied (Group A: 60-140 mJ; Group B: 140-220 mJ, n=4 per level) until veneer debonding. The debonding time and changes in pulpal chamber temperature were recorded. The tooth surface morphology after debonding was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: Both water-air cooling and laser energy significantly affected the debonding time (P<0.0001). The trend of decreasing debonding time with increasing energy exhibited an "energy threshold": approximately 100 mJ for Group A and 200 mJ for Group B. Beyond these thresholds, further energy increase did not lead to a statistically significant reduction in debonding time. Furthermore, when parameters for both groups were set above their respective thresholds, no statistically significant difference in debonding time was observed (P>0.05). The temperature rise in the pulpal chamber of Group A was significantly higher than that of Group B. SEM observations revealed enamel exposure and damage on all tooth surfaces in Group A, whereas in Group B, only occasional pinpoint enamel exposure was observed at the 220 mJ level. Conclusion: Water-air spray cooling is a necessary safety measure for achieving safe and minimally invasive ceramic veneer removal with Er:YAG laser. For 0.5-mm lithium disilicate glass-ceramic veneers, it is recommended to employ continuous water-air cooling and set the laser energy near the identified threshold (200 mJ) to achieve an optimal "efficiency-safety" balance.

Key words: Er:YAG laser, water-air cooling, veneer, debonding