Early Loading at the 3rd Week of SLActive Implant in the Posterior Mandible: 1-Year Results of a Clinical Observation.

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the feasibility of SLActive implants which were functionally loaded after 3 weeks of healing. Methods: 32 partially edentulous patients had a total of 40 implants inserted in the posterior mandibles and underwent undisturbed healing for 3 weeks. The implants were loaded with provisional crowns in the 3rd week. Resonance frequency analysis was assessed by using Osstell MentorTM in the procedure (baseline) and after 1, 3, 12 weeks and 1 year of implants placement. The X-ray cone paralleling radiographs were obtained at 1,3, 12 week and 1 year as well. Results: Statistic analysis revealed that there was a significant difference (P<0.01) between the 3-week and 12-week ISQ values of the implants loaded at the 3rd week, as well as 3-week and 1-year values. The marginal bone was absorbed 0.5±0.21mm within a year after the implants inserted. All the implants were stable without peri-implantitis. The success rate was 100%. Conclusion: The study of using 3-week early loading protocol demonstrates that SLActive implants inserted in posterior mandible may achieve prospective outcomes over a period of 1 year.

Key words: Lower posterior, Implant, Early loading , SLActive , Clinical observation

CLC Number:

R782.1

GENG Wei, LIN Xiao, LI Xiao-guang, et al.. Early Loading at the 3rd Week of SLActive Implant in the Posterior Mandible: 1-Year Results of a Clinical Observation.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2015, 31(5): 475-478.

References

[1] Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface [J]. J Dent Res, 2004, 83(7)∶529-533
[2] Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA^ titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs[J]. Clin Oral Implan Res, 2007, 18(4)∶481-488
[3] Valderrama P, Bornstein MM, Jones AA, et al. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs [J]. J Periodontol, 2011, 82(7)∶1025-1034
[4] Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, et al. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive^) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2007, 34(1)∶78-86
[5] Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Brgger U, et al. Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible [J]. J Periodontol, 2010, 81(6)∶809-818
[6] Sim CPC, Lang N P. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell^TM mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length [J]. Clin Oral Implan Res, 2010, 21(6)∶598-604
[7] 宿玉成等译.牙种植学的负荷方案——牙列缺损的负荷方案.国际口腔种植学会(ITI)口腔种植临床指南[M].第2卷.北京:人民军医出版社,2009∶5
[8] Kim JH, Yang JY, Kim YK, et al. Retrospective results of implants for partially edentulous posterior jaws according to time points of early loading [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012, 28(5)∶1293-1299
[9] Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Brgger U, et al. Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible [J]. J Periodontol, 2010, 81(6)∶809-818

[1]	HU Changqi, WEI Zhenyu, WEI Hongwu, XIA Xun, HUANG Jiangqin, GONG Jinmei, GUO Shuigen. A Retrospective Study on Efficacy of Short Implants (≤6 mm) in Atrophic Posterior Tooth Area for 5-7 Years [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(1): 58-62.
[2]	ZHOU Liwei. A Retrospective Study on Occurrence of Mechanical Complications in Multi-unit Posterior Implants Combining Screw Fixation with Adhesive Fixation [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(1): 63-66.
[3]	YU Huimin, XU Duoling. Smoking Factor on Classification of Alveolar Bone in Maxillary Central Incisors——CBCT Study [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(9): 825-829.
[4]	MA Guowu, JIA Chongzhi. Application of Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Material in the Field of Oral Implant [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(8): 709-712.
[5]	XIA Xun, HU Changqi, HUANG Jiangqin, GUO Shuigen, WEI Hongwu. Effect of Crown-root Ratio of Short Implants on Bone Remodeling:a 5-year Clinical Observation [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(7): 683-687.
[6]	WANG Zhi, ZOU Lidong. Minimally Invasive Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using a Sinus Crestal Approach: A Prospective Case Series Study on Radiologic Outcomes [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(7): 688-692.
[7]	LIU Jianguo, ZHOU Hongbo. Development of β-type Medical Titanium Alloys’ Performance [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(6): 501-508.
[8]	ZHOU Yanmin, WANG Hanchi. A Review on Recent Update and Development in Implant Prosthesis and Its Complications [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(5): 405-409.
[9]	YUE Ke, DONG Heng, CHEN Li, YANG Guangwen, CHEN Lin, LIU Hui, ZHOU Na, MOU Yongbin. Effect of Three-dimensional Pre-formed Titanium Mesh in Maxillary Anterior Region [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(5): 481-485.
[10]	JIA Yongna, GOU Xiaorui, JIANG Dandan, TANG Xiaoxue, ZHOU Zheng. Clinical Efficacy and Bacteriological Analysis on Er:YAG Laser with Three Parameters in Treatment of Early Peri-implantitis [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(5): 486-489.
[11]	XU Hongwei, CHU Shunli.. Progress on Horizontal Augmentation of Posterior Mandible [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(4): 321-323.
[12]	CHEN Jiang, Zhang Sihui. Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Edentulous Implant Restoration with Digital Clinical Workflow [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(3): 193-198.
[13]	YU Kaixuan, ZHOU Yanmin. Research Progress of Radiotherapy on Bone Tissue and Osseointegration around Implants [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(3): 209-212.
[14]	WANG Hanchi, SUN Xiaolin, FANG Jiao, DU Liuyi, PENG Peixuan, ZHOU Yanmin. Effect of Surface Modification of Different Implants on Bacterial Biofilm [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(3): 235-238.
[15]	WU Qianju, ZHANG Zhisheng, LIN Zhiming, JIN Di, ZHANG Yi , LUO Bizhu. Antimicrobial Effect of A Novel Titanium Implant Incorporated with Bioactive Ion [J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2020, 36(3): 247-250.