Abstract: Objective: To compare the clinical effect of SuperBond C&B adhesive system with traditional materials as splint for the stabilization of loose teeth. Methods: After basic periodontal treatment, 228 anterior teeth were randomly divided into three groups: SuperBond C&B (A), Ligation silk composite resin (B) and BiosplintTM (C). Splint fracture rate, periodontal index and objective satisfaction were examined. Fracture rate was detected in 10 posterior teeth splinted with SuperBond C&B. Results: The splint fracture rate in Group A was higher than that of Group B and C 1 month and 3 months after splinting. The calculus index and gingival index in Group A was inferior to that of Group B and Group C. For loose posterior teeth, the SuperBond C&B splinting showed high fracture rate. Conclusion: SuperBond C&B adhesive system is conductive to oral hygiene, aesthetics and comfort for patients, and can be also used in posterior teeth temporarily splinting.

Key words: SuperBond C&B , Stabilization of loosen teeth, Periodontitis