口腔医学研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 700-703.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2024.08.007

• 口腔种植学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

种植修复10分钟及1个月后基台中央螺丝扭矩丧失情况的横断面研究

徐英新   

  1. 北京大学深圳医院口腔医学中心 广东 深圳 518036
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-19 出版日期:2024-08-28 发布日期:2024-08-22
  • 作者简介:徐英新(1980~ )男,沈阳人,主任医师,博士,研究方向:口腔修复临床研究,E-mail: doctorxuyingxin@sina.com。
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市医疗卫生三名工程(北京大学口腔医院俞光岩教授团队)(编号:SZSM202111012);广东省高水平临床重点专科(深圳市配套建设经费)(编号:SZGSP008);深圳大学教学改革与研究项目(编号:JG2021169);北京大学深圳医院教育教学研究基金(编号:JX202004)

Torque Loss in Abutment Screw at Ten Minutes and One Month after Implant Restoration: A Cross-sectional Study

XU Yingxin   

  1. Center of Stomatology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China
  • Received:2024-02-19 Online:2024-08-28 Published:2024-08-22

摘要: 目的: 本横断面研究采用4种不同的种植系统修复单颗前磨牙或磨牙缺失,观察种植修复体戴入,基台中央螺丝初次旋紧后的10 min及1个月,基台中央螺丝扭矩丧失的情况。方法: 2021年7月~2023年6月于北京大学深圳医院口腔医学中心种植科完成单颗后牙种植体植入术后3个月,转修复科修复的患者268例,戴入了在二氧化锆全冠中央开孔并与基台口外粘接的改良粘接固位种植修复体。修复体调整至合适后,按照各厂家要求的扭矩旋紧基台中央螺丝。分别观察基台中央螺丝初次旋紧10 min及1个月后,当扭矩扳手再次旋紧基台中央螺丝至厂家要求的扭矩时,扭矩扳手自旋转起点至终点顺时针旋转的角度。旋转的角度越大,说明基台中央螺丝扭矩丧失的情况越严重。结果: 基台中央螺丝初次旋紧10 min后再次旋紧时,所有实验组病例扭矩扳手旋转的角度均为0°。基台中央螺丝初次旋紧1个月后再次旋紧时,无论实验组(基台中央螺丝初次旋紧10 min后曾再次旋紧)还是对照组(基台中央螺丝初次旋紧10 min后未再次旋紧),无论前磨牙组还是磨牙组,无论种植体是Ankylos、Straumann、Zimmer或Nobel,所有病例扭矩扳手旋转角度均>0°。其中,共有29例病例(10.82%)扭矩扳手旋转的角度>90°,且这一比例在各组间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。没有病例扭矩扳手旋转的角度达到或超过180°。结论: 在部分种植系统中,单颗后牙种植修复后1个月,部分病例基台中央螺丝扭矩丧失的情况较为明显,且比例与是否曾在基台中央螺丝初次旋紧10 min后再次加力,及前磨牙或磨牙位点、采用何种植系统无关。

关键词: 扭矩丧失, 二次加力, 沉降效应, 种植修复, 基台中央螺丝

Abstract: Objective: To investigate torque loss in the abutment screw of single posterior implant restoration at 10 minutes and 1 month after initial tightening of the screw in premolar or molar position with 4 different implant systems. Methods: From July 2021 to June 2023, 268 patients who underwent single posterior tooth implant surgery at the Implant Department of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital were transferred to the Prosthetic Department for restoration three months after the surgery. The patients were worn a cement-retained zirconia crown with an opening hole in the occlusal surface for the convenient of detachment. After adjustment, the central screws of the abutments were tightened through opening hole according to the preload suggested by the manufacturer. At 10 minutes and 1 month after the initial tightening, when tightening the central screw of the abutment again to the manufacturer’s suggested preload, the clockwise rotation angle of the torque wrench from the starting point to the end point was recorded. Results: At 10 minutes after the initial tightening, the rotation angle of torque wrench for all experimental groups was 0 degrees. However, at 1 month after the initial tightening, no matter which group, tooth, or implant, the rotation angle of torque wrench was greater than 0 degrees. Among them, 29 cases (10.82%) were greater than 90 degrees, however, no significant differences were found between groups (P>0.05). No case reached or exceeded 180 degrees. Conclusion: In some implant systems, 1 month after a single posterior implant restoration, the loss of torque in the central screw of the abutment is more significant in some cases, and the proportion is not related to whether the central screw of the abutment has been tightened again 10 minutes after the initial tightening, as well as the premolar or molar site and the implant system used.

Key words: torque loss, retightening, settling effect, dental implant restoration, abutment screw