不同酸蚀模式对通用型粘接剂粘接效果的影响

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.11.004

口腔医学研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (11): 1018-1021.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2022.11.004

不同酸蚀模式对通用型粘接剂粘接效果的影响

姜步琳¹, 黄翠^1,2*

1.武汉大学口腔医学院口腔基础医学省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地和口腔生物医学教育部重点实验室湖北武汉 430079;
2.武汉大学口腔医学院修复科湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2021-11-24 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-11-22
通讯作者: *黄翠,E-mail:huangcui@whu.edu.cn
作者简介:姜步琳(1996~ ),女,湖北宜昌人,博士在读,研究方向:口腔修复学。

Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bonding Effects of Universal Adhesives

JIANG Bulin¹, HUANG Cui^1,2*

1. The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Department of Prosthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2021-11-24 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通用型粘接剂是一类既可使用酸蚀冲洗模式,又可以使用自酸蚀模式的粘接剂,临床应用简单便捷,因此受到了口腔医生的青睐。然而,不同酸蚀模式的原理、临床应用条件及粘接效果可能存在差异。本文就通用型粘接剂在不同酸蚀模式下的粘接效果进行综述,结果发现针对不同牙体组织界面应采取不同的酸蚀模式。对于釉质粘接,使用酸蚀-冲洗模式的粘接效果更好;对于牙本质粘接,超温和型通用型粘接剂更适合选择酸蚀-冲洗模式,温和型通用型粘接剂更适合自酸蚀模式;对于特殊的牙齿组织例如氟牙症和硬化牙本质,酸蚀-冲洗模式能够更加有效的粘接,而龋病影响的牙本质在不同酸蚀模式下粘接强度没有差异。

关键词: 通用型粘接剂, 酸蚀-冲洗, 自酸蚀, 粘接

Abstract: Universal adhesives can be used for both etch-and-rinse and self-etch approaches. Their clinical applications are simple and convenient, so they are favored by many dentists. However, different etching modes bring different bonding effect. In this study, the bonding effect of different etching modes of universal adhesives were reviewed. For enamel bonding, the use of etch-and-rinse mode resulted in higher bond strengths than self-etch mode. For dentin bonding, etch-and-rinse mode was more suitable for super mild universal adhesives and self-etch mode was more suitable for mild universal adhesives. For special tooth surface such as dental fluorosis and sclerotic dentin, the application of acid etching was able to bond more strongly, as for caries affected dentin, there was no significant difference in the bonding strengths between two etching modes.

Key words: universal adhesives, etch-and-rinse, self-etching, bonding

姜步琳, 黄翠. 不同酸蚀模式对通用型粘接剂粘接效果的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(11): 1018-1021.

JIANG Bulin, HUANG Cui. Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bonding Effects of Universal Adhesives[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2022, 38(11): 1018-1021.

参考文献

[1] 黄翠,刘英衡.口腔粘接与粘固的区别和联系[J].口腔医学研究,2021,37(5):381-385.
[2] Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives [J]. Dent Mater,2011,27(1):17-28.
[3] 郭景梅,雷文龙,杨宏业,等.通用型粘接剂在口腔粘接修复中的应用[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016,51(3):189-192.
[4] Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, et al. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin [J]. J Dent, 2017, 62:72-80.
[5] Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, et al. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability-A systematic review [J]. Materials, 2019, 12(5):790.
[6] Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, et al. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems [J]. Oper Dent, 2016, 41(5):520-530.
[7] Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes [J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(7):800-807.
[8] Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(7):765-776.
[9] Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine-Old wine in new bottles? [J]. J Dent, 2015, 43(5):525-536.
[10] 朱轩言,朱松.提高通用粘接剂与牙本质粘接性能的研究进展[J].口腔医学研究,2021,37(10):883-885.
[11] Elkaffas AA, Hamama H, Mahmoud SH. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2018, 43(3):e29.
[12] Cruz J, Silva A, Eira R, et al. Dentin permeability and nanoleakage of universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse vs self-etch modes [J]. Oper Dent, 2021, 46(3):293-305.
[13] Sezinando A, Perdigao J, Ceballos L. Long-term in vitro adhesion of polyalkenoate-based adhesives to dentin [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2017, 19(4):305-316.
[14] Manfroi FB, Marcondes ML, Somacal DC, et al. Bond strength of a novel one bottle multi-mode adhesive to human dentin after six months of storage [J]. Open Dent J, 2016, 10:268-277.
[15] Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives [J]. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(26):3757-3785.
[16] Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin [J]. Oper Dent, 2015, 40(3):282-292.
[17] Shahroom N, Mani G, Ramakrishnan M. Interventions in management of dental fluorosis, an endemic disease: A systematic review [J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2019, 8(10):3108-3113.
[18] Cardenas AFM, Armas-Veja A, Rodriguez Villarreal JP, et al. Influence of the mode of application of universal adhesive systems on adhesive properties to fluorotic enamel [J]. Braz Oral Res, 2019, 33:e120.
[19] Siqueira FSFD, Armas-Vega A, Izquierdo-Bucheli A, et al. Does the conditioning mode and duration of universal adhesives affect the bonding effectiveness to fluorotic enamel? [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2019, 21(6):525-536.
[20] Badavannavar AN, Ajari S, Nayak K, et al. Abfraction: Etiopathogenesis, clinical aspect, and diagnostic-treatment modalities: A review [J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2020, 31(2):305-311.
[21] Josic U, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, et al. Is clinical behavior of composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions influenced by the application mode of universal adhesives? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Dent Mater, 2021, 37(11):e503-e521.
[22] Ranjitha GR, Vikram R, Meena N, et al. Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial [J]. J Conserv Dent, 2020, 23(3):227-232.
[23] Pinna R, Maioli M, Eramo S, et al. Carious affected dentine: its behaviour in adhesive bonding [J]. Aust Dent J, 2015, 60(3):276-293.
[24] Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, et al. The impact of artificially caries-affected dentin on bond strength of multi-mode adhesives [J]. J Conserv Dent, 2018, 21(2):136-141.
[25] Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, et al. Degradation of multimode adhesive system bond strength to artificial caries-affected dentin due to water storage [J]. Oper Dent, 2018, 43(2):E92-E101.
[26] Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, et al. The bonding performance of a universal adhesive to artificially-created caries-affected dentin [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2017, 19(4):317-321.
[27] Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, et al. Is there a best protocol to optimize bond strength of a universal adhesive to artificially induced caries-affected primary or permanent dentin? [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2016, 18(5):441-446.

不同酸蚀模式对通用型粘接剂粘接效果的影响

Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bonding Effects of Universal Adhesives

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	麻健丰, 王成. 仿生理念在口腔医学研究领域的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(9): 801-806.
[2]	郭锐, 黄翠. 非龋性颈部缺损粘接前的牙本质处理[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(8): 722-724.
[3]	宋逸婷, 朱莉, 徐一迪, 刘思文, 林婷婷, 黄盛斌, 林继兴, 麻健丰. 飞秒激光诱导氧化锆陶瓷微结构及对其粘结性能的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(3): 261-267.
[4]	周立伟, 李孟铨. 多单位种植修复中组合运用螺丝固位与粘接固位的临床回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(2): 125-128.
[5]	任颖超, 孔祥红, 何苗苗, 张梦雅, 肖燕. 根管封闭剂iRoot SP和AH Plus与牙本质粘接强度的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(10): 936-940.
[6]	全璐璐, 李雪微, 赵俊杰, 邓文振, 张旭, 董伟, 梁永强. 正畸改性流动树脂的体外研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(8): 712-716.
[7]	黄翠, 刘英衡. 口腔粘接与粘固的区别和联系[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(5): 381-385.
[8]	罗有成, 赵健, 杨双, 吴哲. 不同粘接间隙对CAD/CAM PMMA暂时修复体固位力的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(4): 325-329.
[9]	牟文博, 程瑶, 董波. 苯扎氯铵改性粘接剂对牙本质-树脂远期粘接强度的影响研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(4): 344-348.
[10]	牟亚群, 高士军, 汝晓娜, 尹通, 肖媛媛, 初明慧, 刘苗. 黄芩素与葛根素对牙本质粘接持久性的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(4): 349-353.
[11]	王璐瑶, 沈帅, 牛玉梅, 潘爽. NaClO溶液的浓度和作用时间对树脂牙本质粘结界面的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(2): 126-130.
[12]	杨柳青, 王博灏, 谢立莉. EGCG改性牙科粘接剂的抗菌研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(2): 131-134.
[13]	齐凤娜, 孙红蕾, 许华, 李军科, 程瑞卿. PLA可吸收根管桩联合氰基丙烯酸酯粘接剂在婴幼儿前牙残冠的临床应用研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(2): 135-138.
[14]	朱轩言, 朱松. 提高通用粘接剂与牙本质粘接性能的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(10): 883-885.
[15]	刘小雪, 李艳萍, 何丽娜, 李季, 戴鑫睿, 牛玉梅. 不同粘接系统联合硅烷偶联剂对陈旧性复合树脂粘接效果的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(10): 936-939.