Effect of Different Materials on Curative Effect and Microleakage of Elderly Patients with Root Caries

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.09.007

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effects of different repair materials on the curative effect and microleakage of elderly patients with root caries. Methods: One hundred and fourteen elderly patients with root caries who were treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups with 57 cases each. The control group was repaired with light-curing composite resin, and the observation group was repaired with glass ionomer cement. The clinical efficacy, microleakage, periodontal indicators, and inflammatory factor levels in gingival crevicular fluid were compared. Results: The treatment success rate of the control group was 91.22%, which was not statistically different from the observation group's 94.74% (P>0.05). The observation group's microleakage rate was 3.51%, which was lower than the control group's 8.94% (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in GCF volume and GCF probe depth between two groups before repair (P>0.05). After treatment, the GCF volume and GCF probe depth of two groups were higher than those before treatment, and the GCF volume and GCF probe depth of control group were higher than those of observation group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and MMP-2 in gingival crevicular fluid between two groups before repair (P>0.05). After repair, the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and MMP-2 in the two groups were significantly increased, and the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and MMP-2 in the control group were higher than those in the observation group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Glass ionomer cement repair and light-curing composite resin repair have the same success rate in the treatment of elderly patients with root caries, but the glass ionomer cement repair has a lower rate of microleakage and has a smaller effect on the periodontal indicators and gingival sulcus inflammatory factors.

Key words: repair material, root caries, microleakage

LAN Jing, LUO Jianong, LI Wei, ZOU Ling. Effect of Different Materials on Curative Effect and Microleakage of Elderly Patients with Root Caries[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(9): 800-804.

References

[1] 沈耀川,郑歆,叶燕惠,等.中国大陆老年人根面龋患龋率及流行病学特征的Meta分析[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(3):301-306.
[2] Nazem D, Biclesanu CF, Paluta D, et al. Study of marginal microleakage in root caries restored with resin composites, giomers and glass ionomer cements [J]. Mater Plast, 2017, 54(4): 740.
[3] Ayatollahi F, Zarebidoki F, Razavi SH, et al. Comparison of microleakage of CEM Cement apical plug in different powder/liquid ratio in immature teeth using fluid filtration technique [J]. J Dent, 2019, 20(1): 37-42.
[4] 杨薇,王健平,刘鑫喆,等.氟纳米羟基磷灰石对早期根面龋再矿化效果的实验研究[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(2):191-193.
[5] 陈爽,薛欣,金星爱,等. 牙本质表面处理对树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘接强度的影响[J].口腔疾病防治,2021,29(2):63-67.
[6] 吴补领,赵望泓.老年根面龋诊疗指南(讨论稿)[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2016,14(2):116-119.
[7] Ramezanali F, Aryanezhad S, Mohammadian F, et al. In vitro microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement and biodentine intra-orifice barriers [J]. Iran Endod J, 2017, 12(2): 211-214.
[8] 杨明旭,鲁蓓.中国2010年分省死亡率与预期寿命——基于各省第六次人口普查资料[J].人口研究,2019,43(1):18-35.
[9] Demirel G, Gür G, Eryilmaz M, et al. The effects of self-etch bio-active dental adhesive systems on bacterial microleakage [J]. J Adhes Sci Technol, 2018, 32(10): 1044-1054.
[10] Turkistani A, Almutairi M, Banakhar N, et al. Optical evaluation of enamel microleakage with one-step self-etch adhesives [J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2018, 36(11): 589-594.
[11] Al Tuwirqi AA, Alshammari AM, Felemban OM, et al. Comparison of penetration depth and microleakage of resin infiltrant and conventional sealant in pits and fissures of permanent teeth in vitro [J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2019, 20(11): 1339-1344.
[12] Lone MM, Khan FR. Evaluation of micro leakage of root canals filled with different obturation techniques: An in vitro study [J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2018, 30(1): 34-39.
[13] Münevveroğlu AP, Ozsoy A, Ozcan M. Microleakage of high viscosity glass-ionomer and glass-carbomer with and without coating before and after hydrothermal aging [J]. Braz Dent Sci, 2019, 22(1): 79-87.
[14] Ghajghouj O, Taşar-Faruk S. Evaluation of fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns with different intracoronal depths and restorative materials luted with various resin cements [J]. Materials, 2019, 12(16): 2528-2531.
[15] Ertürk Avunduk AT, Balar S. Evaluation of microleakage in class Ⅴ cavities prepared by different caries removal methods [J]. Microsc Res Techniq, 2019, 82(9): 1566-1574.
[16] Rahawi OS, Ahmad MB, Ismail SA. Evaluation of apical microleakage of endodontically treated teeth sealed with three different root canal sealers [J]. Al-Rafidain Dent J, 2019, 19(1): 11-19.
[17] Çirakoğlu S, Baddal B, Îslam A. The effectiveness of laser-activated irrigation on the apical microleakage qualities of MTA repair HP and NeoMTA plus in simulated immature teeth: A comparative study [J]. Materials, 2020, 13(15): 3287-3290.
[18] Nematollahi H, Bagherian A, Ghazvini K, et al. Microbial microleakage assessment of class Ⅴ cavities restored with different materials and techniques: A laboratory study [J]. Dent Res J, 2017, 14(5): 344-349.
[19] Feiz A, Nazeri R, Karimi K, et al. The effects of surface treatments on root dentin analyzing microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts [J]. Ann Den Spec Vol, 2017, 5(4): 151.
[20] Shahraki HAE, Saberi EA, Maserrat V, et al. In vitro comparison of apical micro leakage in root canal prepared wave one and reciproc files [J]. J Biochem Tech, 2020, 11(2): 65-70.