Bibliographic Characteristics of Top 100 Cited Articles Last Decade in Dentistry.

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.04.026

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To analyze bibliographic characteristics of highly cited papers last decade in dentistry. Methods: Bibliographic characteristics including publication year, publishers, journals, authors and their countries of top 100 (TOP 100) cited papers in dentistry between 2006 and 2016 were obtained from the Web of Science database. Open or toll access and methodological designs were determined in full-text papers. Bibliographic characteristics were analyzed. Results: TOP 100 papers were mainly from the year 2006 to 2008 (72%). Ninety-three percent papers were from dental journals, >1/3 from the Elsevier, >2/3 from toll access. The top 10 countries by paper number were the Western, followed by China ranking 11. Sixty-three papers were done by one country. The most common international collaboration involved 2 to 4 countries. There were 4 authors per paper on average and 6 papers most per author. Periodontology including implantology was the main research area (37%). Review or expert opinion was the main methodological design (53%). Conclusion: Bibliographic characteristic analysis of highly cited papers provides researchers delicate guidelines on publication and evaluation of research works and on academic communication and directions.

Key words: Article, Bibliometrics, Citation, Dentistry, Open access, Publication

YU Ting, ZHAO Li, QIN Wen-guang, ZHANG Jin-cai, XUAN Dong-ying. Bibliographic Characteristics of Top 100 Cited Articles Last Decade in Dentistry.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(4): 452-456.

References

[1] Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernandez-Varela M, et al. The 100 most cited articles in dentistry [J]. Clin Oral Investig,2014,18(3)∶699-706
[2] Van Noorden R. Open access: the true cost of science publishing[J]. Nature,2013,495(7442)∶426-429
[3] 王嫚,赵莉,王波,等. 国际高影响因子口腔医学期刊分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(5)∶696-700
[4] Baltussen A, Kindler C. Citation classics in anesthetic journals [J]. Anesth Analg,2004,98(2)∶443-451
[5] Hua F, Sun H, Walsh T, et al. Open access to journal articles in dentistry: prevalence and citation impact [J]. J Dent,2016,47∶41-48
[6] Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC, et al. The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access: an evidence-based review [J]. F1000Res,2016,5∶632
[7] Shu F, Haustein S. On the citation advantage of tweeted papers at the journal level [Z]. 2017
[8] 中国科学技术信息研究所. 中国科技论文的整体表现[Z]. http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1557-1083214.html (2017-11-16访问)
[9] Sugimoto CR, Robinson-Garcia N, Murray DS, et al. Scientists have most impact when they're free to move [J]. Nature,2017,550(7674)∶29-31
[10] Johansen M, Thomsen SF. Guidelines for reporting medical research: a critical appraisal [J]. Int Sch Res Notices,2016,2016∶1346026
[11] Brennan PA, Habib A. What are we reading? A study of downloaded and cited articles from the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in 2010 [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2011,49(7)∶527-531
[12] Dumont JE. The bias of citations [J]. Trends Biochem Sci,1989,14(8)∶327-328
[13] Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O'Brien PJ. 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2011,469(5)∶1487-1497
[14] Parker JN, Lortie C, Allesina S. Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology [J]. Scientometrics,2010,85(1)∶129-143
[15] Seglen P. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research [J]. BMJ,1997,314(7079)∶498-502
[16] Elangovan S, Allareddy V. Publication metrics of dental journals - what is the role of self citations in determining the impact factor of journals [J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract,2015,15(3)∶97-104