Difference and Connection between Dental Bonding and Luting

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.05.001

Abstract

Abstract: There are differences between dental bonding agents and luting cements, including their properties, classifications, interface treating methods, and operating techniques. In order to help dental practitioners achieve a better understanding of dental bonding and luting, select relevant products properly, and facilitate adhesive restoration outcomes, this article will discuss the distinction and relationship between bonding and luting in dental practice

Key words: bonding, dental bonding agents, dental adhesives, luting, luting cements

HUANG Cui, LIU Yingheng. Difference and Connection between Dental Bonding and Luting[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(5): 381-385.

References

[1] 商务国际辞书编辑部.现代汉语词典[M].北京:商务印书馆国际有限公司,2019:996-997.
[2] 庞正其,丁春花, 潘文亮. “粘结”与“粘接”在文字写作中的用法探讨[J].今传媒,2017,(3):149-150.
[3] 中华口腔医学会牙体牙髓病学专业委员会.复合树脂直接粘接修复操作规范的专家共识[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2019,54(9):618-622.
[4] 中华口腔医学会口腔修复学专业委员会. 瓷贴面粘接技术操作规范[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2020,55(6):373-377.
[5] The glossary of prosthodontic terms: ninth edition [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(5S): e1-e105.
[6] 赵铱民.口腔修复学[M].第8版.人民卫生出版社, 2020:89.
[7] Breschi L, Maravic T, Cunha SR, et al. Dentin bonding systems: From dentin collagen structure to bond preservation and clinical applications [J]. Dental Materials, 2017, 34(1):78-96.
[8] Meerbeek BV, Yoshihara K, Landuyt KV, et al. From buonocore's pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2020, 22(1): 7-34.
[9] Bedran-Russo A, Leme-Kraus AA, Vidal CMP, et al. An overview of dental adhesive systems and the dynamic tooth-adhesive interface [J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2017, 61(4): 713-731.
[10] Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review [J]. Dent Mater, 2014, 30(10): 1089-1103.
[11] Delbons FB, Perdigão J, Araujo E, et al. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in posterior restorations-18-month results [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2015, 27(2):107-117.
[12] Szesz A, Parreiras S, Reis A, et al. Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Dent, 2016, 53: 1-11.
[13] 郭景梅,雷文龙,杨宏业,等.通用型粘接剂在口腔粘接修复中的应用[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2016,51(3):189-192.
[14] Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal' adhesives[J].Dent Mater, 2016, 32:1218-1225.
[15] Dimitriadi M, Panagiotopoulou A, Eliades G, et al. Stability and reactivity of γ-MPTMS silane in some commercial primer and adhesive formulations[J].Dent Mater, 2018, 34:1089-1101.
[16] Yao C, Yu J, Huang C, et al. Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives [J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34:809-818.
[17] 赵信义.牙科水门汀的选择及应用[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2015,50(8):462-465.
[18] Pameijer CH. A review of luting agents [J]. Int J Dent, 2012, 2012: 752861.
[19] Seghi RR, Leyva Del Rio D. Biomaterials: ceramic and adhesive technologies [J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2019, 63(2): 233-248.
[20] Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 81(3): 335-343.
[21] Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2006, 96(6): 433-442.
[22] Vallittu PK, Boccaccini AR, Hupa L, et al. Bioactive dental materials—Do they exist and what does bioactivity mean? [J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(5):693.
[23] Blatz MB, Vonderheide M, Conejo J. The effect of resin bonding on long-term success of high-strength ceramics [J]. J Dent Res, 2018, 97(2): 132-139.
[24] Bayazit EÖ. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics prepared with different surface treatments [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2019, 32(5):433-438.