种植体周软组织封闭建立的难点与改善方案

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.04.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 稳定的软组织封闭对于防止微生物入侵,维持种植体的长期稳定性至关重要。种植体周软组织封闭由上皮附着与结缔组织附着两部分构成,与天然牙相比附着较弱,易被外界干扰因素破坏,增加种植体周围疾病的发生率。因此,促进种植体周软组织封闭形成并保持稳定对于维持种植体长期成功尤为重要。本文将分析种植体软组织封闭难以建立并维持稳定的原因,并总结目前用以促进软组织封闭的主要方法,以期为种植领域研究人员与临床医生提供相关参考。

关键词: 种植体, 软组织封闭, 上皮附着, 结缔组织附着, 表面改性

Abstract: Stable soft tissue sealing around dental implants is essential for the prevention of microbial invasion and the long-term success of implant-supported prosthesis. It is composed of the epithelial attachment and the connective tissue attachment, which are weaker compared with the soft tissue sealing around natural teeth. The sealing is susceptible to detrimental external stimulates and inflammatory peri-implant diseases. Therefore, it is of great importance to promote the establishment of soft tissue sealing for the long-term success of the dental implants. This review will analyze the reasons underlying the difficulty in establishing and maintaining a stable peri-implant soft tissue sealing, and summarize the methods for improving it, so as to provide a comprehensive review for the researchers and clinicians.

Key words: dental implant, soft tissue sealing, epithelial attachment, connective tissue attachment, surface modification

季平. 种植体周软组织封闭建立的难点与改善方案[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(4): 279-283.

JI Ping. Difficulties in the Establishment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Sealing and Improving Strategies[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(4): 279-283.

参考文献

[1] Peramo A, Marcelo CL. Bioengineering the skin-implant interface: the use of regenerative therapies in implanted devices [J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2010, 38(6): 2013-2031.
[2] Affeld K, Grosshauser J, Goubergrits L, et al. Percutaneous devices: a review of applications, problems and possible solutions [J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2012, 9(4): 389-399.
[3] Atsuta I, Ayukawa Y, Kondo R, et al. Soft tissue sealing around dental implants based on histological interpretation [J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2016, 60(1): 3-11.
[4] Ikeda H, Shiraiwa M, Yamaza T, et al. Difference in penetration of horseradish peroxidase tracer as a foreign substance into the peri-implant or junctional epithelium of rat gingivae [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002, 13(3): 243-251.
[5] Ikeda H, Yamaza T, Yoshinari M, et al. Ultrastructural and immunoelectron microscopic studies of the peri-implant epithelium-implant (Ti-6Al-4V) interface of rat maxilla [J]. J Periodontol, 2000, 71(6): 961-973.
[6] Moon IS, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, et al. The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1999, 26(10): 658-663.
[7] Abdallah MN, Badran Z, Ciobanu O, et al. Strategies for optimizing the soft tissue seal around osseointegrated implants [J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2017, 6(20).
[8] Berglundh T, Gislason O, Lekholm U, et al. Histopathological observations of human periimplantitis lesions [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2004, 31(5): 341-347.
[9] Fretwurst T, Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Nelson K, et al. Characterization of macrophages infiltrating peri-implantitis lesions [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(3): 274-281.
[10] Carcuac O, Berglundh T. Composition of human peri-implantitis and periodontitis lesions [J]. J Dent Res, 2014, 93(11): 1083-1088.
[11] Lindhe J, Ericsson I. Effect of ligature placement and dental plaque on periodontal tissue breakdown in the dog [J]. J Periodontol, 1978, 49(7): 343-350.
[12] Derks J, Schaller D, Håkansson J, et al. Peri-implantitis - onset and pattern of progression [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2016, 43(4): 383-388.
[13] Carcuac O, Abrahamsson I, Albouy JP, et al. Experimental periodontitis and peri-implantitis in dogs [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(4): 363-371.
[14] Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(7): 635-641.
[15] Nothdurft FP, Fontana D, Ruppenthal S, et al. Differential behavior of fibroblasts and epithelial cells on structured implant abutment materials: a comparison of materials and surface topographies [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(6): 1237-1249.
[16] Liñares A, Grize L, Muñoz F, et al. Histological assessment of hard and soft tissues surrounding a novel ceramic implant: a pilot study in the minipig [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2016, 43(6): 538-546.
[17] Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A, et al. Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps [J]. J Periodontol, 2006, 77(1): 73-80.
[18] Glauser R, Schüpbach P, Gottlow J, et al. Periimplant soft tissue barrier at experimental one-piece mini-implants with different surface topography in humans: A light-microscopic overview and histometric analysis [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2005, 7 Suppl 1:S44-S51.
[19] Furuhashi A, Ayukawa Y, Atsuta I, et al. The difference of fibroblast behavior on titanium substrata with different surface characteristics [J]. Odontology, 2012, 100(2): 199-205.
[20] Baharloo B, Textor M, Brunette DM. Substratum roughness alters the growth, area, and focal adhesions of epithelial cells, and their proximity to titanium surfaces [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2005, 74(1): 12-22.
[21] Puckett SD, Lee PP, Ciombor DM, et al. Nanotextured titanium surfaces for enhancing skin growth on transcutaneous osseointegrated devices [J]. Acta Biomater, 2010, 6(6): 2352-2362.
[22] Smith BS, Yoriya S, Johnson T, et al. Dermal fibroblast and epidermal keratinocyte functionality on titania nanotube arrays [J]. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7(6): 2686-2696.
[23] Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. A light and electron microscopic study of the effects of surface topography on the behavior of cells attached to titanium-coated percutaneous implants [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1991, 25(3): 387-405.
[24] Abdallah MN, Abdollahi S, Laurenti M, et al. Scaffolds for epithelial tissue engineering customized in elastomeric molds [J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2018, 106(2): 880-890.
[25] Oyane A, Hyodo K, Uchida M, et al. Preliminary in vivo study of apatite and laminin-apatite composite layers on polymeric percutaneous implants [J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2011, 97(1): 96-104.
[26] Pendegrass CJ, El-Husseiny M, Blunn GW. The development of fibronectin-functionalised hydroxyapatite coatings to improve dermal fibroblast attachment in vitro [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2012, 94(4): 564-569.
[27] Bates C, Marino V, Fazzalari NL, et al. Soft tissue attachment to titanium implants coated with growth factors [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 15(1): 53-63.
[28] Satué M, Gómez-Florit M, Monjo M, et al. Improved human gingival fibroblast response to titanium implants coated with ultraviolet-irradiated vitamin D precursor and vitamin E [J]. J Periodontal Res, 2016, 51(3): 342-349.
[29] Pendegrass CJ, Tucker B, Patel S, et al. The effect of adherens junction components on keratinocyte adhesion in vitro: potential implications for sealing the skin-implant interface of intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prostheses [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2012, 100(12): 3463-3471.
[30] Gristina AG. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration [J]. Science (New York, NY), 1987, 237(4822): 1588-1595.
[31] Sargeant TD, Rao MS, Koh CY, et al. Covalent functionalization of NiTi surfaces with bioactive peptide amphiphile nanofibers [J]. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(8): 1085-1098.
[32] Chen R, Willcox MD, Ho KK, et al. Antimicrobial peptide melimine coating for titanium and its in vivo antibacterial activity in rodent subcutaneous infection models [J]. Biomaterials, 2016, 85:142-151.
[33] Gerits E, Kucharíková S, Van Dijck P, et al. Antibacterial activity of a new broad-spectrum antibiotic covalently bound to titanium surfaces [J]. J Orthop Res, 2016, 34(12): 2191-2198.
[34] Córdoba A, Hierro-Oliva M, Pacha-Olivenza M, et al. Direct covalent grafting of phytate to Titanium surfaces through Ti-O-P bonding shows bone stimulating surface properties and decreased bacterial adhesion [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(18): 11326-11335.
[35] Hu X, Neoh KG, Shi Z, et al. An in vitro assessment of titanium functionalized with polysaccharides conjugated with vascular endothelial growth factor for enhanced osseointegration and inhibition of bacterial adhesion [J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(34): 8854-8863.
[36] Lv H, Chen Z, Yang X, et al. Layer-by-layer self-assembly of minocycline-loaded chitosan/alginate multilayer on titanium substrates to inhibit biofilm formation [J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(11): 1464-1472.
[37] Zhou L, Lai Y, Huang W, et al. Biofunctionalization of microgroove titanium surfaces with an antimicrobial peptide to enhance their bactericidal activity and cytocompatibility [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2015, 128:552-560.
[38] Zhao L, Wang H, Huo K, et al. Antibacterial nano-structured titania coating incorporated with silver nanoparticles [J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(24): 5706-5716.
[39] He S, Zhou P, Wang L, et al. Antibiotic-decorated titanium with enhanced antibacterial activity through adhesive polydopamine for dental/bone implant [J]. J R Soc Interface, 2014, 11(95): 20140169.
[40] Lee SJ, Heo DN, Lee HR, et al. Biofunctionalized titanium with anti-fouling resistance by grafting thermo-responsive polymer brushes for the prevention of peri-implantitis [J]. J Mater Chem B, 2015, 3(26): 5161-5165.
[41] Ali K, Kay EJ. Which type of soft tissue augmentation at dental implant sites is best supported by evidence? [J]. Evid Based Dent, 2020, 21(4): 140-141.