Research Progress on Accuracy of Adjoining Relationship between Mandibular Wisdom Tooth and Lower Alveolar Nerve

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2019.04.003

Abstract

Abstract: Inferior alveolar never (INA) injury, one of the most serious complications of mandibular wisdom tooth extraction, is drawn widely prevalence for the severe influence on the quality of people life. In preoperative risk assessment of mandibular wisdom tooth extraction, panoramic radiograph is used as the first choice. However, the diagnostic accuracy of the adjoining relationship between mandibular wisdom tooth and inferior alveolar nerve has aroused many arguments at home and abroad. This review summarizes the diagnosis accuracy of panoramic radiography in describing the relationship between the two.

Key words: Panoramic radiograph, Mandibular wisdom tooth, INA, Diagnosis

QIN Li-ye,ZHOU Zhong-wei. Research Progress on Accuracy of Adjoining Relationship between Mandibular Wisdom Tooth and Lower Alveolar Nerve[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2019, 35(4): 319-321.

References

[1] Ali AS, Benton JA, Yates JM. Risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury with coronectomy vs surgical extraction of mandibular third molars-A comparison of two techniques and review of the literature [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2018, 45(3):250-257.
[2] Agbaje JO, Heijsters G, Salem AS, et al. Coronectomy of deeply impacted lower third molar: Incidence of outcomes and complications after one-year follow-up [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2015, 6(2): e1
[3] Winstanley KL, Otway LM, Thompson L, et al. Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone-beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population [J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2018, 9(3): e12323.
[4] Bell GW, Rodgers JM, Grime RJ, et al. The accuracy of dental panoramic tomographs in determining the root morphology of mandibular third molar teeth before surgery [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2003, 95(1):119-125.
[5] Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(7):1303-1308.
[6] Jung YH, Nah KS, Cho BH. Correlation of panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of a superimposed relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars [J]. Imaging Sci Dent, 2012, 42(3):121-127.
[7] Ohman A, Kivijärvi K, Blombäck U, et al. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2006, 35(1):30-35.
[8] Kim HG, Lee JH. Analysis and evaluation of relative positions of mandibular third molar and mandibular canal impacts [J]. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 40(6):278-284.
[9] Atieh MA. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68(1):74-82.
[10] Blaeser BF, August MA, Donoff RB, et al. Panoramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar extraction [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2003, 61(4):417-421.
[11] Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 63(1):3-7.
[12] Bell GW. Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome [J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 42(1):21-27.
[13] Gomes AC, Vasconcelos BC, Silva ED, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molars [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008, 66(2):256-259.
[14] Rodriguez Y Baena R, Beltrami R, Tagliabo A, et al. Differences between panoramic and Cone Beam-CT in the surgical evaluation of lower third molars [J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017, 9(2): e259-e265.
[15] Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, et al. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 38(9):964-971.
[16] Luo Q, Diao W, Luo L, et al. Comparisons of the computed tomographic scan and panoramic radiography before mandibular third molar extraction surgery [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24:3340-3347.
[17] Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, et al. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 109(2):276-284.
[18] Weckx A, Agbaje JO, Sun Y, et al. Visualization techniques of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN): a narrative review [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2016, 38(1):55-63.
[19] Sinanoglu A, Helvacioglu YD, Mutlu I. Use of cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional modeling for assessment of anomalous pulp canal configuration: a case report [J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2015, 40(2):161-165.