Journal of Oral Science Research ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 485-488.DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2021.06.001
WANG Zhiying*
Received:
2021-03-28
Online:
2021-06-28
Published:
2021-06-17
WANG Zhiying. Application of Digital Technique in Dental Implant Restoration of Severe Alveolar Bone Deficiency[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2021, 37(6): 485-488.
[1] Stefanelli LV, deGroot BS, Lipton DI, et al. Accuracy of a dynamic dental implant navigation system in a private practice[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019, 34(1):205-213. [2] Chen CK, Yuh DY, Huang RY, et al. Accuracy of implant placement with a navigation system, a laboratory guide, and freehand drilling [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(6):1213-1218. [3] Mediavilla GA, Riad DE, Zubizarreta-Macho A, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided dynamic navigation compared to computer-aided static navigation for dental implant placement: An in vitro study [J]. J Clin Med, 2019 , 8(12): 2123. [4] Stefanelli LV, Graziani U, Pranno N, et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation surgery in the placement of pterygoid implants [J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2020, 40(6):825-834. [5] Gallucci GO, Benic GI, Eckert SE, et al. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for implant loading protocols [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29 Suppl:287-290. [6] Maló P, de Araú joNobre M, Lopes A, et al. The All-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: A longitudinal study with 5-13 years of follow-up [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(4): 538-549. [7] Maló P, de Araú joNobre M, Lopes A, et al. The All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(4): 565-577. [8] Gherlone E, Capparé P, Vinci R, et al. Conventional versus digital impressions for “All-on-Four” restorations [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016,31(2):324-330. [9] Harris BT, Montero D, Grant GT, et al. Creation of a 3-dimentional virtual dental patient for computer-guided surgery and CAD-CAM interim complete removable and fixed dental prostheses: a clinical report [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(2):192-204. [10] Papaspyridakos P, Rajput N, Kudara Y, et al. Digital workflow for fixed implant rehabilitation of an extremely atrophy edentulous mandible in three appointments [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2017, 29(3):178-188. [11] Lopes A, de Araújo Nobre M, Santos D. The workflow of a new dynamic naviation system for the insertion of dental implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: report of two cases [J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(2):421. [12] Zhang T, Zhang T, Cai X. The application of a newly designed L-shape titanium mesh for GBR with simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic zone: a retrospective case series study [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(5):862-872. [13] Li S, Zhang T, Zhou M, et al. A novel digital and visualized guided bone regeneration procedure and digital precise bone augmentation: a case series [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2021, 23(1):19-30. [14] Chiapasco M, Casentini P. Horizontal bone-augmentation procedures in implant dentistry: prosthetically guided regeneration [J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1):213-240. [15] Meereis W, de Souza F, Albino B, et al. Digital smile design for computer-assisted esthetic rehabilitation: two-year follow-up [J]. Oper Dent, 2016, 41(1):E13-E22. [16] Hartmann A, Seiler M. Minimizing risk of customized titanium mesh exposures-a retrospective analysis[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1):36. [17] Tallarico M, Park CJ, Lumbau AI, et al. Customized 3D-printed titanium mesh developed to regenerate a complex bone defect in the aesthetic zone: A case report approached with a fully digital workflow [J]. Materials (Basel), 2020, 13(17):3874. [18] Li L, Wang C, Li X, et al. Resaerch on the dimensional accuracy of customized bone augmentation combined with 3D-printing. individualized titanium mesh: a retrospective case series study [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2021, 23(1):5-18. [19] Starch-Jensen T, Jensen JD. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a review of selected treatment modalities [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2017, 8(3):e3. [20] Cho SW, Yang BE, Cheon KJ, et al. A simple and safe approach for maxillary sinus augmentation with the advanced surgical guide [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(11):3785. [21] Cristoforetti A, Stavola LD, Fincato A, et al. Assessing the accuracy of computer-planned osteotomy guided by stereolithographic template: a methodological framework applied to the mandibular bone harvesting [J]. Comput Biol Med, 2019, 114:103435. [22] Sakkas A, Ioannis K, Winter K, et al. Clinical results of autologous bone augmentation harvesting frome the mandibular ramus prior to implant placement. A analysis of 104 cases [J]. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW, 2016, 5:Doc21. [23] Stavola LD, Fincato A, Bressan E, et al. Results of computer-guided bone block harvesting from the mandible: a case report [J]. Int J Periodont Restor Dent, 2017,37(1):e111-e119. [24] Jacotti M, Barausse C, Felice P. Posterior atrophic mandible reconstruction with onlay allograft created with CAD-CAM procedure: a case report [J]. Implant Dent, 2014, 23(1):22-28. [25] Blume O, Hoffmann L, Donkiewicz P, et al. Treatment of severely resorbed maxilla due to peri-implantitis by guided bone regeneration using a customized allogenic bone block: a case report [J]. Materials (Basel), 2017, 10(10):1213. [26] Nave PD, Queralt AV. Zygomatic Implants for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae: A retrospective study on survival rate and biologic complications of 206 implants with a minimum follow-up of 1 year [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2020, 35(6):1177-1186. [27] Schramm A, Gellrich NC, Schimming R, et al. Computer-assisted insertion of zygomatic implants (Brånmark system) after extensive tumor surgery [J]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtchir, 2000, 4(5):292-295. [28] Schiroli G, Angiero F, Silvestrini-Biavati A, et al. Zygomatic implant placement with flapless computer-guided surgery: a proposed clinical protocol [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(12):2979-2989. [29] Agliardi EL, Romeo D, Panigatti S, et al. Immediate full-arch rehabilitation of the severily atrophied maxilla supported by zygomatic implants: A prospective clinical study with minimum follow-up of 6 years [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 46(12):1592-1599. [30] Zhou W, Fan S, Wang F, et, al. A novel extraoral registration method for a dynamic navigation system guiding zygomatic implant placement in patients with maxillectomy defects [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 50(1):116-120. [31] Fan SQ, Hong KF, Bornstein M, et al. The effect of fiducial marker configurations on the accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: an in vitro study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019, 34(1):85-90. [32] Wang F, Bornstein MM, Hung KF, et al. Application of real-time surgical navigation for zygomatic implant insertion in patients with severely atrophic maxilla [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 76(1):80-87. [33] Signorini L, Faustini F, Samarani R, et al. Immediate fixed rehabilitation supported by pterygoid implants for participants with severe maxillary atrophy: 1-Year postloading results from a prospective cohort study [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020:S0022-3913(20)30259-6. [34] Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Admakin O. Full in-office guided surgery with open selective tooth-supported templates: a prospective clinical study on 20 patients [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(11):2361-2370. [35] Stefanelli LV, Graziani U, Pranno N, et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation surgery in the placement of pterygoid implants [J]. Int J Periodont Restor Relat Dent, 2020,40(6):825-834. [36] Schepers RH, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. Fully 3-dimentional digitally planned reconstruction of a mandible with a free vascularized fibula and immediate placement of an implant-supported prosthetic construction [J]. Head Neck, 2013, 35(4):E109-E114. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||