A Review on Recent Update and Development in Surface Modification of Dental Implants.

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.04.001

Abstract

Abstract: It is one of the focuses for scholars to improve the osseointegration and antibacterial efficacy of dental implants by surface modification. Dental implants treated with different surface modifications have different effects on bacteria and cells. With the deepening of the research, surface modification technology has been improved in recent years, and has made great progress in promoting cell adhesion,improving the osseoperception,promoting soft tissue healing, and enhancing antibacterial properties. In this paper, the recent progress of implant surface modification is reviewed from the aspect of modification effect.

Key words: Dental implants, Surface modification, Bacteria, Cells, Osseoperception

ZHOU Yan-min, WANG Han-chi, ZHAO Jing-hui, LIU Chun-ying, WANG Nan.. A Review on Recent Update and Development in Surface Modification of Dental Implants.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2018, 34(4): 343-346.

References

[1] Jemat A, Ghazali MJ, Razali M, et al. Surface modifications and their effects on titanium dental implants [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015∶791725
[2] Gansukh O, Jeong J, Kim J, et al. Mechanical and histological effects of resorbable blasting media surface treatment on the initial stability of orthodontic mini-implants [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2016, 2016∶1-9
[3] Kim HC, Park SY, Han MS, et al. Occurrence of progressive bone loss around anodized surface implants and resorbable blasting media implants: a retrospective cohort study [J]. J Periodontol , 2017, 88(4)∶329-337
[4] Pachauri P, Bathala LR, Sangur R, et al. Techniques for dental implant nanosurface modifications [J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2014, 6(6)∶498-504
[5] Chen Z, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. Influence of laser-microtextured surface collar on marginal bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue response: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Periodontol, 2017, 88(7)∶651-662
[6] Li G, Cao H, Zhang W, et al. Enhanced osseointegration of hierarchical micro/nanotopographic titanium fabricated by microarc oxidation and electrochemical treatment [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(6)∶3840-3852
[7] Chiang HJ, Hsu HJ, Peng PW, et al. Early bone response to machined, sandblasting acid etching (SLA) and novel surface-functionalization (SLAffinity) titanium implants: characterization, biomechanical analysis and histological evaluation in pigs [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2016, 104(2)∶397-405
[8] Calvo-Guirado JL,Satorres M,Negri B, et al. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of four different titanium implant surface modifications: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia [J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2014, 18(5)∶1495-1505
[9] Li X, Chen T, Hu J, et al. Modified surface morphology of a novel Ti-24Nb-4Zr-7.9Sn titanium alloy via anodic oxidation for enhanced interfacial biocompatibility and osseointegration [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2016, 144∶265-275
[10] Barui S, Chatterjee S, Mandal S, et al. Microstructure and compression properties of 3D powder printed Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds with designed porosity: Experimental and computational analysis [J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2017, 70(Pt 1)∶812-823
[11] Tan XP, Tan YJ, Chow CSL, et al. Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: A state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility [J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2017, 76∶1328-1343
[12] Bai Y, Zhou R, Cao J, et al. Microarc oxidation coating covered Ti implants with micro-scale gouges formed by a multi-step treatment for improving osseointegration [J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2017, 76∶908-917
[13] Yang DH, Moon SW, Lee DW. Surface modification of titanium with BMP-2/GDF-5 by a heparin linker and its efficacy as a dental implant [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2017, 18(1). pii: E229
[14] Yoo SY, Kim SK, Heo SJ, et al. Biochemical responses of anodized titanium implants with a poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/bone morphogenic protein-2 submicron particle coating. part 1: an in vitro study [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2015, 30(3)∶512-518
[15] Canullo L, Genova T, Tallarico M, et al. Plasma of argon affects the earliest biological response of different implant surfaces: an in vitro comparative study [J]. J Dent Res, 2016, 95(5)∶566-573
[16] Corpas Ldos S,Lambrichts I,Quirynen M, et al. Peri-implant bone innervation: histological findings in humans [J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2014, 7(3)∶283-292
[17] Li X, Liao D, Gong P, et al. Biological behavior of neurally differentiated periodontal ligament stem cells on different titanium implant surfaces [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2014, 102(8)∶2805-2812
[18] 李保胜.不同种植体表面形貌对神经再生影响的初步研究[D].吉林大学, 2013
[19] Saghiri MA, Ghasemi M, Moayer AR, et al. A novel method to evaluate the neurocompatibility of dental implants [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(1)∶41-50
[20] Fan YW,Cui FZ,Hou SP, et al. Culture of neural cells on silicon wafers with nano-scale surface topograph [J]. J Neurosci Methods, 120(1)∶17-23
[21] Bürgers R, Gerlach T, Hahnel S, et al. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010, 21(2)∶156-164
[22] Lin HY, Liu Y, Wismeijer D, et al. Effects of oral implant surface roughness on bacterial biofilm formation and treatment efficacy [J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013, 28(5)∶1226-1231
[23] 叶长林. 不同植体表面与实验性种植体周围炎相关性的研究[D]. 安徽医科大学, 2015
[24] Cui CX, Gao X, Qi YM, et al. Microstructure and antibacterial property of in situ TiO₂ nanotube layers/titanium biocomposites [J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2012, 8(2)∶178-183
[25] Sengstock C, Lopian M, Motemani Y, et al. Structure-related antibacterial activity of a titanium nanostructured surface fabricated by glancing angle sputter deposition [J]. Nanotechnology, 2014, 25(19)∶195101-195111