Accuracy of A Commonly-used Surgical Template.

doi:10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.04.009

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of surgical templates which have different located modes with the aid of CT and computer-aided design and manufacture technology. Methods: Teeth-supported and mucosa-supported templates were used in surgery for 90 implants. The actual and designed implant positions were recorded accordingly. The hex, apex, depth, and angular deviation of implants were analyzed. Results: For teeth supported surgical template, the mean hex deviation, apex deviation, depth deviation, and angular deviation were 1.56mm, 1.78mm, 1.1mm, and 2.96°, respectively. The mean hex deviation, apex deviation, depth deviation, and angular deviation for mucosa supported surgical template were 1.71mm ,1.9mm, 1.09mm, and 3.19°, respectively. Conclusion: Teeth-supported templates are more accuracy than mucosa-supported templates. Compared with specific templates, the commonly-used templates had no significance in depth, hex, and angular deviation.

Key words: Computer-aided implantology , Surgical template , Accuracy

CLC Number:

R783.2

XU Liang-wei, CHENG Kang-jie, PENG Wei, YAO Chun-yan .. Accuracy of A Commonly-used Surgical Template.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2017, 33(4): 382-385.

References

[1] Barnea E, Alt I, Kolerman R, et al. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med O, 2010, 109(5)∶E6-E10
[2] Noharet R, Pettersson A, Bourgeois D. Accuracy Of Implant Placement In the Posterior Maxilla as Related To 2 Types Of Surgical Guides: A Pilot Study In the Human Cadaver [J]. J Prosthetic Dent, 2014, 112(3)∶526-532
[3] Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of Computer-Aided Oral Implant Surgery: A Clinical and Radiographic Study [J]. Int J Oral Max Implant, 2009, 24(2)∶234-242
[4] 杨雪超,赵世勇,江千舟,等.三维打印导板辅助下的微创根尖手术新方法[J].口腔医学研究,2016 ,32(9)∶944-947
[5] Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I. Impact Of Operator Experience on the Accuracy Of Implant Placement with Stereolithographic Surgical Templates: An In Vitro Study [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(4)∶248-254
[6] Kalpidis CDR, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: A review of the literature [J]. J Period, 2004, 75(5)∶631-645
[7] Pettersson A, Kero T, Gillot L, et al. Accuracy Of Cad/Cam-Guided Surgical Template Implant Surgery on Human Cadavers: Part I [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2010, 103(6)∶334-342
[8] Cassetta M, Stefanelli L V, Giansanti M, et al. Accuracy of Implant Placement with a Stereolithographic Surgical Template [J]. Int J Oral Max Implant, 2012, 27(3)∶655-663
[9] Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, et al. Accuracy of Virtually Planned and Template Guided Implant Surgery on Edentate Patients [J]. Clin Implant Dent Res, 2012, 14(4)∶527-537
[10] Di Giacomo G a P, Cury P R, De Araujo N S, et al. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: Preliminary results [J]. J Period, 2005, 76(4)∶503-507
[11] D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, et al. A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae [J]. Clin Implant Dent R, 2012, 14(2)∶293-303
[12] Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, et al. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: Clinical data from 94 implants [J]. J Period, 2008, 79(8)∶1339-1345