Esthetic Outcome of Single Implant Crowns following Immediate Implant Treatment and Delayed Implant Treatment in the Anterior Maxillary.

doi:10.11839/kqyxzh.2016.01.013

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To compare the esthectic outcome of single implant crowns following immediate implant treatment (IIT) and delayed implant treatment (DIT) in the anterior maxillary. Methods: Forty-two dental implants were included in the study, 20 implants received immediate implant treatment and 22 implants received delayed implant treatment. Intra-oral digital photographs were obtained 6 months after final restoration. Pink esthetic score (PES) and white esthetic score (WES) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the parameters between two groups. Results: The implant survival of IIT was 95.0% and that of DIT was 100%. There was no significant difference between two groups. Mean values of PES were 12.05±0.97 for IIT and 10.50±1.57 for DIT. Mean values of WES were 8.00±1.41 for IIT and 6.95±1.21 for DIT. Significant differences were found between the two groups in PES and WES. 68.4% of the IIT group showed perfect pink esthetic outcome (PES≥12), but only 22.7% in the DIT group. These values showed statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The IIT group showed a better pink and white esthetic outcome than the DIT group in a short observing period, and they can get comparable implant survival.

CLC Number:

R782.12

XIA Ting, SHI Bin.. Esthetic Outcome of Single Implant Crowns following Immediate Implant Treatment and Delayed Implant Treatment in the Anterior Maxillary.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2016, 32(1): 50-54.

References

[1] Enriquez-Sacristan C, Barona-Dorado C, Calvo-Guirado JL, et al. Immediate post-extraction implants subject to immediate loading: a meta-analytic study [J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2011, 16(7)∶e919-24
[2] Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005, 16(6)∶639-44
[3] Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, et al. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2011, 38(8)∶746-53
[4] Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, et al. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores [J]. J Periodontol, 2009, 80(1)∶140-51
[5] van Kesteren CJ, Schoolfield J, West J, et al. A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25(3)∶562-70
[6] Block MS, Mercante DE, Lirette D, et al. Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67(11)∶89-107
[7] Botticelli D, Berglundh T , Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2004, 31(10)∶820-8
[8] Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, et al. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(6)∶645-52
[9] Chen S T, Darby I B , Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18(5)∶552-62
[10] Caiazzo A, Brugnami F , Mehra P. Buccal plate preservation with immediate post-extraction implant placement and provisionalization: preliminary results of a new technique [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 42(5)∶666-70
[11] Raes F, Cosyn J, Crommelinck E, et al. Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2011, 38(4)∶385-94
[12] Cabello G, Rioboo M, Fabrega JG. Immediate placement and restoration of implants in the aesthetic zone with a trimodal approach: soft tissue alterations and its relation to gingival biotype [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(10)∶1094-100
[13] Cosyn J, De Bruyn H , Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restorations: a 1-year prospective study [J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013, 15(6)∶847-57
[14] Cordaro L, Torsello F , Roccuzzo M. Clinical outcome of submerged vs. non-submerged implants placed in fresh extraction sockets [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(12)∶1307-13
[15] De Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, et al. Instant provisionalization of immediate single-tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(6)∶566-70